Template:Did you know nominations/Vox (website)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 13:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Vox (website)

edit

Created by Czar (talk). Self nominated at 23:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough and doesn't seem to be copied from the cited sources or from elsewhere. It's neutrally worded and well cited. (Though as a minor point, I don't see where the Carr article supports the claim of three months' preparation. Did I miss it or is this a mistake that needs to be fixed?) The hook is appropriate and its claims are supported by the Economist article. QPQ is completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychonaut (talkcontribs) 14:52, 2 January 2015‎ (UTC)
Good catch! Should have been sourced to the other NYT article, but it still isn't clear that it was January to April launch, so I nixed it czar  17:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but I can't find any mention of The Guardian in the The Economist. The author seems to be W. W. (writing from Houston) rather than W. W. Houston? Fuebaey (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
@Fuebaey, you're right. The in-text attribution was off. Fixed czar  23:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Could you fix the hook and the rest of that paragraph? Fuebaey (talk) 18:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
@Fuebaey, sorry about that—thought I already did those. Take a look now? czar  04:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, restoring Psychonaut's tick. Fuebaey (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)