- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 22:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
WDCA
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 16:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WDCA; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
- Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
![Yes](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/13px-Green_check.svg.png)
|
Overall:
Newly promoted GA. Appears to meet all the criteria. AGF on the source, which for some reason I am not able to access. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's not in TWL's ProQuest bundle. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)