Template:Did you know nominations/William Colfax

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of William Colfax's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC).
not enough original content

William Colfax

edit

Created by WilliamKF (talk). Self nominated at 22:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are sourced to a book, a reliable source, and accepted in good faith. However this is the only source for the article, and it would be preferable to have more than one source. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Most of the article is copied directly from the single cited source. That source is old enough to be PD, so I've added an attribution template, but there is barely any original material - doesn't come close to meeting the 1500-character minimum. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)