Template:Did you know nominations/William Fowler (Brothertown Indian)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Referencing

William Fowler (Brothertown Indian)

edit

Created/expanded by Orangemike (talk). Self nom at 14:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Article meets size criteria. Sources are reliable. Background section needs references, which is crucial since its facts are embedded within the hook. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 09:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
  • The adjustments that have been made still doesn't back up the claims. I haven't found anything about the Great Lakes, Wisconsin, or 1831-1836 in pp. 271-279 in Thomas Commuck's Document M: Fourth and Fifth Annual Reports and Collections of State Historical Society. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 18:25, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Previous problems fixed. Some statements still requires clarification. The fact that he was "the first non-white legislator" isn't backed up by the references [1] and [2] in the introduction of the article, which claims that. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 08:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The fact that he was an Indian was deemed so extraordinary as to deserve a footnote every year in the annual Annals of the Legislature in the state Blue Book. The first black legislator, Lucien Palmer was not to be elected until the early 20th century, and there is evidence to suggest that he was elected accidentally, since he shared a name with a prominent Masonic leader of the area and was not re-elected two years later. Wisconsin has not, to my knowledge, ever elected an Asian/Pacific or Australian Aboriginal legislator. How on Earth do I further document what is widely known to Wisconsin historians? --Orange Mike | Talk 17:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
If it is widely known to Wisconsin historians then those people probably published it as well on numerous occasions. Just cite one of them. Otherwise if it is based on "to your knowledge" then it is out of question WP:OR. A good and recent DYK example for a similar statement properly cited is William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950), who was the "first African American to be awarded the Medal of Honor", but contrary to the current case it was nicely referenced. The same would be needed here. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 20:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
  • No improvements have been made in the past week, so I'd say no to this nomination. Anyhow other editors are welcomed to contradict me and re-review the artilce if they feel so. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 15:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)