Template:Did you know nominations/William Vitarelli
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
William Vitarelli
edit- ... that after William Vitarelli won a US Supreme Court case that associated him with the Communist Party USA, he led various community and educational projects in Micronesia?
- ALT1:... that William Vitarelli led various community and educational projects in Micronesia after winning a US Supreme Court case that associated him with the Communist Party USA?
- Reviewed: Mary Alice Powell Lindsay
Created by FallingGravity (talk). Self-nominated at 21:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC).
- @FallingGravity: New enough when nominated; long enough; no copyvio or close paraphrasing; neutral; QPQ done. The hooks are a little awkwardly phrased, though - it wasn't the case itself that associated him with the Communist Party. ALT1 is a little cleaner, so maybe:
- ALT2:... that William Vitarelli led community and educational projects in Micronesia after winning a US Supreme Court case about his alleged associations with the Communist Party USA?
- Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @FallingGravity: Is that copyedited hook OK with you? Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looks great. My only quibble would be if the word "concerning" would be better than the word "about", though my mind keeps flip-flopping on the issue. I figure they both mean pretty much the same thing. FallingGravity (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- In that case, good to go, either word is fine :) Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looks great. My only quibble would be if the word "concerning" would be better than the word "about", though my mind keeps flip-flopping on the issue. I figure they both mean pretty much the same thing. FallingGravity (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- @FallingGravity: Is that copyedited hook OK with you? Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- @FallingGravity: New enough when nominated; long enough; no copyvio or close paraphrasing; neutral; QPQ done. The hooks are a little awkwardly phrased, though - it wasn't the case itself that associated him with the Communist Party. ALT1 is a little cleaner, so maybe: