- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Willow (song)
- ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" was filmed without using the song? Source: Rolling Stone
- Reviewed: Rosl Zapf
Created by Saiff Naqiuddin (talk), BawinV (talk), Ashleyyoursmile (talk), Doggy54321 (talk), and BillieLiz (talk). Nominated by Shuipzv3 (talk) at 12:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- ? - Other problems: - This is definitely not the most interesting fact about the music video. I've suggested a couple below, all from the same Rolling Stone source.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Great to see the speed of the creation/expansion and the number of editors collaborating on this! Pick a hook from below or counter-suggest and this'll be good to go. — Bilorv (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" avoids showing some dancers' faces because they were wearing masks as a COVID-19 precaution?
- ALT2: ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" only used 10 dancers due to COVID-19 restrictions, but more were added with visual effects? (fact not currently mentioned in article)
- ALT3: ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" featured orbs rather than bonfires due to the 2020 California wildfires?
@Shuipzv3: Would you pick one of the alternative hooks? Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Hanif Al Husaini: I had considered 1 and 2 but decided not to because I was trying to avoid mentioning a negative event like the pandemic. Maybe it's just my bias because the pandemic certainly has resulted in a lot of negative impacts for me. I didn't consider 3 but I'm also iffy about it for the same negative event reason. However, I would go for 1. Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: Shuipzv3 has picked a hook, would you approve this? Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Alright,
ALT1 approved 
Ugh, I always forget this—we need an uninvolved reviewer to verify this hook because I suggested it. Apologies for the confusion. We just need someone to check that ALT1 is accurate, mentioned in the article and cited inline. — Bilorv (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Alright,
- @Bilorv: Shuipzv3 has picked a hook, would you approve this? Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Hanif Al Husaini: I had considered 1 and 2 but decided not to because I was trying to avoid mentioning a negative event like the pandemic. Maybe it's just my bias because the pandemic certainly has resulted in a lot of negative impacts for me. I didn't consider 3 but I'm also iffy about it for the same negative event reason. However, I would go for 1. Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
