Template talk:2020 XFL standings
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Coltsfan in topic Clutter
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Clutter
edit@Cwmoneybags, Mifoi123, Mes tex, and Coltsfan: I think this template is looking a little cluttered at the moment. IMO, we don't have a need for the TD +/- column (or this could be reduced to just a "differential" column). I recognize that the XFL website has these, but I don't really see a need for them here. Thoughts? PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @PCN02WPS: Looks like touchdown differential is the first playoff tiebreaker according to [1]. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, but maybe we should simplify a bit. Maybe the TDs and the GB should go, yeah. Coltsfan (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Eagles247 and Coltsfan: If TD +/- is the first tiebreaker, perhaps we could ditch the points differential and/or SOS/SOV? PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, do we have to put all (or the main ones) tiebreakers in the template? In the NFL template, apart from the main two main ones', not all (and not most) are there. Coltsfan (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, having a conversation here all of us is pretty cool... Yeah i'm new! :) Ok, getting rid of GB, SOS and SOV would be indeed a good idea because they have no impact and would simplify the table. TD+/- (TD+ and TD-) is the first tiebreaker so it has to stay. Mifoi123 (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Unless anyone objects, I'm going to go ahead and take out GB, SOS, and SOV around the time that today's first game starts. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sure. Keep the TD +/- as a compromise. Coltsfan (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Unless anyone objects, I'm going to go ahead and take out GB, SOS, and SOV around the time that today's first game starts. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, having a conversation here all of us is pretty cool... Yeah i'm new! :) Ok, getting rid of GB, SOS and SOV would be indeed a good idea because they have no impact and would simplify the table. TD+/- (TD+ and TD-) is the first tiebreaker so it has to stay. Mifoi123 (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, do we have to put all (or the main ones) tiebreakers in the template? In the NFL template, apart from the main two main ones', not all (and not most) are there. Coltsfan (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Eagles247 and Coltsfan: If TD +/- is the first tiebreaker, perhaps we could ditch the points differential and/or SOS/SOV? PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)