Template talk:Chutiya dynasty
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Chaipau in topic Duplicating kings
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Purandarnarayan
editPlease give another source for the Dhakuakhana grant. The current sources you have provided are not WP:HISTRS. This is especially problematic because there are a lot of 19th century - 21st century politics riding on these. It is OK to discuss these issues in Chutia kingdom in an NPOV fashion, but it is not OK to insert non-consensus stuff in a template since the template will be used in multiple articles. Chaipau (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicating kings
edit@Homogenie: These identifications are given by Neog (1977). Are you trying to challenge what is given in the historical literature and input your own research results? Chaipau (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Homogenie: read the list given in Neog (1977) page 817:
- Nandi
- Satyanarayana
- Lakshminarayana
- Durlabhnarayana
- Pratyashanarayana
- Yasamanarayana
- So please do not insert your own research here and recreate a table not given in the literature.
- Chaipau (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
@Chaipau: ok!
- Also Sankhadhwajpal comes from the lineage of Birpal, which historians have rejected as fabricated in the 19th century. Look at the reference to N N Acharya in S Dutta's book and read up the N N Acharya's PhD Theses p225-227. This list has been rejected by Neog, D Nath, Ramesh Burhagohain, Shin and others. Chaipau (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)