Template talk:Did you know/Babanin

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Casliber

Babanin

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Created by Moto53 (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 09:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hook: Interest is rather low, image somewhat confusing at 100px. Length is fine, AGF on the sourcing.
Article: Only cited to two different places on one site, with pretty bare formatting. Could that be improved? AGF on the quality of the references and the paraphrasing. Seems neutral enough. Wouldn't the family crest be PD?
Summary:  A hookier hook would be nice, but I won't be too picky on that. Could a better variety of references and better citations be included please? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I find no other internet or book srces; left a note with the author, though. Also, I ce'd the hook. Rcej (Robert)talk 05:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Referencing doesn't seem strong enough for the main page. (posting here as my comment disappears if posted below) Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry that there's not alot of information. The family splitted into many sub-houses, still crried the name, but the familt it self had a split. The house still exists, but not in an orginized way. Again, sorry that I don't have more information to offer. --Moto53