Template talk:Did you know/Brotherton Library

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Gerda Arendt

Brotherton Library

edit
Archived nomination
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

Created by GuillaumeTell (talk). Self nom at 18:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  date, length, hook fine. Please, for formality, reference some more paragraphs, refs may be doubled, it helps the reader. The lead - as a summary - doesn't need refs. I suggest to word Brotherton Library of the University of Leeds, to avoid "Leeds's". The main source is a list, the article prose, no plagiarism. Official sources, no copyvio. Happy reading, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Will move the refs out of the lead and add some more later today. I've moved the U of L as suggested, but I'm doubtful about "of the", so left it out. "At the" sounds better to me, but it looks OK (IMO) without either. --GuillaumeTell 16:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Fine. Someone else reading this will not know what "Leeds's" referred to, in general rather propose an ALT (and strike the former if not an option). But it's minor wording in this case, just next time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply