Template talk:Did you know/David T. Beers

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Crisco 1492

David T. Beers

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

Created by Malick78 (talk). Self nom at 13:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  •   Almost there. Please verify each ref url, and add an accessdate to each ref. Also, the final ref is just a bare url; please include ref info. BTW, if this is not your first DYK self-nom, plz add a link to the last DYK article review you have completed :) Rcej (Robert)talk 06:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Hi, thanks for the recommendations. As far as I can tell (see Wikipedia:Did you know/Citation), there is no requirement for access dates, however. I'll change the bare url, though, and I'll review another DYK since this isn't my first self-nom (btw, is that still a requirement, to review another DYK? I looked carefully for that, because it used to exist, but I couldn't find it anywhere). Regards, Malick78 (talk) 10:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Access dates are generally considered important, because the links may die eventually and we need access dates to show that they used to work. Adding them would be a simple matter and save a lot of trouble in the long run. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Well, I didn't add the unreferenced para (Rcej assumed I did), but I tried to find a ref for the last part of it and failed. So I cut the last sentence. The article is still long enough though. The missing section can be readded if and when somebody with a reference wants to.. Malick78 (talk) 19:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply