Template talk:Did you know/Jingū-ji
Jingū-ji
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)
- ... that jingū-ji, Buddhist temples with a shrine dedicated to the worship of a local kami, were quite common in Japan until they were outlawed in the 19th century?
Created by Urashimataro (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 22:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
The length (prose ~8k) and creation date qualify, but the lede text is a close paraphrase of the cited source. Article text: These temples were erected in the belief that the shrine's kami was a sentient being suffering for karmic reasons, and therefore in need of the power of Buddhism. Source text: The early jingūji were constructed based on the premise that deities — who were thought to have been born as kami due to karmic retribution — could be liberated from their suffering through Buddhism. I did not check the remainder of the article;
- They don't appear to me to be "close", but I'll alert the author, anyway. --PFHLai (talk) 23:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Rewrote the lead. -- Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Paraphrasing seems fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, but I did promise to re-review this, and it looks great. Sorry if my paraphrasing sensor was too sensitive. The article text, date, sourcing and hook all check out. I added italics to jingu-ji in the hook. Maybe an alternate hook to explicitly indicate the mixed-religion usage (the reason they were outlawed):
- alt: ... that jingū-ji, Buddhist temples with a shrine dedicated to the worship of a local Shinto kami, were common in Japan until they were outlawed in 1868?
- No sweat, none of us is in a hurry, especially in August. The alternative hook is fine, but explaining why they were outlawed within the length limits is probably impossible.