Template talk:Historical capitals of Serbia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Iaof2017 in topic Pristina
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2015 March 17. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
| This template was considered for deletion on 2016 February 5. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Temišvar
editTemišvar was not capital of Serbia, but of Serbian Voivodeship and Tamiš Banat province of Austro-Hungary.--Mladifilozof (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I already gave you answer here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Voivodeship_of_Serbia_and_Banat_of_Temeschwar - there is no point to discuss the same issue on two pages. By the way, voivodship existed from 1849 to 1860 and was a province of Austrian Empire and Austria-Hungary was formed in 1867 (so much about your historical knowledge, thought...). PANONIAN 10:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Podgorica/Ston
edit1034–1113 Podgorica/Ston entry should be checked. Was those two towns ever capital of Serbia? --WhiteWriter speaks 10:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Pristina
editI don't know how Pristina made it into this article, but it was basically a big village in 1389 and in bibliography it is discussed as: The Kosovo myth had grown around a battle the Christians fought against the Ottomans at a field outside the province's contemporary capital Pristina in 1389.
[1] --Maleschreiber (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was also wondering why Pristina was included.--Lorik17 (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)