This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I noticed that a lot of users had commented on the large size of the existing Indian cuisine template. It took up most of the page and made it difficult to make use of infoboxes as it was a vertical template. Also, it only linked to different regional cuisine pages, some of which have still not been developed, and have a lot of red links.
This template can be easily added at the end of a page, and I have tried to link all existing popular dishes of India, also segregated by region.
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This is much much better, I would not worry about putting dishes in the infobox, there should be a link to a List of Indian Dishes instead, as the list is potentially endless.--Chef Tanner (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I agree. The term Dishes has no end. The term Cuisine on the other hand is sufficiently broad. I would suggest that you Be Bold and edit that template itself. Rather than create a new one. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply