This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ladakh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ladakh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LadakhWikipedia:WikiProject LadakhTemplate:WikiProject LadakhLadakh articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
"Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The "Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered. Compare the following two templates. Note in the template "India–Pakistan relations" - "Simla Agreement" is listed under "Treaties and Summits". Should others also be included in this template such as Tashkent Declaration and Agra summit.
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Abhishek0831996, care to explain why you're POV-pushing and labelling peaceful organizations such as Tehreek-e-Hurriyat as "terrorist jihadist" groups, when TeH hasn't even been classified as such by any government or organization in the world? (Read: WP:OR). Furthermore, while Dukhtaran-e-Millat has been banned by India for separatism, as a peaceful all-women organisation which has never engaged in militancy or been designated as a terrorist group by any other country, does it seriously count as "terrorist jihadist" group in the league of ISIS-K? Then there's the non-jihadi militants like JKLF (again, not even banned by the Indian government[1]). If you insist on lumping all of them under the same label, then "Separatist/Militant" conforms to WP:NPOV. Cipher21(talk)18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply