Template talk:Municipalities of Kosovo

Stop edit warring over the map

I am the creator of the initial map (Image:Kosovo municipalities.svg), and I see now that it is true that my map represents a Serbian view of the divisions, not that this was deliberate on my behalf. In Cradel's map Image:Municipalities of Kosovo.svg the Dragash municipality is shown as including what was previously known as the municipality of Opolje, whereas my map shows it as being a part of Prizren. Perhaps Cradel's map is more appropriate, a search on google shows that many maps show Opolje as being a part of Prizren though. Cradel's map is probably more modern and widely accepted. Jackaranga (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The most reliable maps I could find corroborate my map, but they are somewhat out of date, it is hard to tell really because there is so much bias in the information. A google search shows that my map is the correct one, with sources such as UNMIK and worldbank, but wikipedia, especially the article on Opolje shows that Cradel's map is the correct one. So who knows. Also the website for the State of Kosovo is very poor. Jackaranga (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

How would you know that your map represents a Serbian view? You yourself admit that you don't know: "So who knows". Maybe because you think I'm Serbian and thus assume that the version I'm reverting to is the "Serbian view". Such bias. I'm not Serbian by the way. --GOD OF JUSTICE 22:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Assume good faith or don't bother writing, I assume it's the Serbian view because they didn't acknowledge the fact Opolje had joined the municipality of Gora. Jackaranga (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I do assume good faith, I did that with Bindi Capriqi, but then he showed what his goals were, and his changing of accounts to "Cradel" can't mask that (at least for those who remember User:Bindicapriqi)... --GOD OF JUSTICE 21:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Here is a source [1] (PDF), also look at one of the sources you gave for you map, there are also other differences, like malisevo, pristina, novo brdo etc. but I hadn't noticed them earlier, so I will modify them later -- CD 10:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Source

In this kind of template, there is no need for source. So, in 4 days, i will remove sources, if all are ok with that? 89.216.196.107 (talk) 21:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Also, following the all other Kosovo related articles, Serbian should be first, Albanian second. 89.216.196.107 (talk) 10:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tadija, sorry 89.216.196.107, sources are OK in the template as they are from UN and OSCE and the disputed nature of Kosovo. About which language should go first, sources say the Albanian one. Thank you. kedadial 22:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)