Template talk:Rail-interchange

Edit request 9 October 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: I was wondering if we could change the info for the New Orleans streetcars? They don't match the correct colors or streetcar numbers. Also, can we add in a symbol for the Rocky Mountaineer? Endrias Kassa (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Endrias Kassa: Your change for line 47 does not meet MOS:CONTRAST for WP:ACCESSIBILITY. Making the text black would correct this. Bazza 7 (talk) 09:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Deactivating request pending a response to Bazza 7's comment. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Would this be more acceptable?
The lack of uniformity is slightly annoying but if it meets the accessibility guidelines then I think it is acceptable. Tape fanatic 007 (talk) 14:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's better, thanks. There is no requirement for indicators to match "real life", but there is a requirement for Wikipedia to be accessible. Bazza 7 (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're Welcome. Oh btw, in case it isn't apparent, St. Charles remains the same. Just thought I'd clarify that. Tape fanatic 007 (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you want me to file a proper edit request for these changes to be officially considered. Please let me know. Tape fanatic 007 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 13 November 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: Update the new orleans streetcar system icons to reflect current colors and numbers based on this. This includes changing the colors for the canal lines and the Rampart line. Alongside renumbering the Rampart-St. Claude line to 46. Also, adding the new Loyola-Riverfront line numbered 49. St. Charles and Riverfront line are unaffected by this edit. The new loyola-riverfront icon will be called up by using {{rint|neworleans|loyola-riverfront}}. Please delete the "" in the last entry in the changed text. I could not figure out how to stop it from displaying an error. The reason it kept displaying an error is because the current data page has no data for {{rint|neworleans|loyola-riverfront}}. If you have any other questions please let me know.

Tape fanatic 007 (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Tape fanatic 007: Please use Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox to show precisely which changes are required. I have pointed this out on numerous previous occasions, but people still persist on using code blobs in the talk page (whether using TextDiff or otherwise) which is both error-prone and untestable. Therefore,   Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok will do. Tape fanatic 007 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 14 November 2024 - Thessaloniki Metro

edit

Proposed changes to template code: see here.

Michail (blah) 01:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sarah fides: Please use Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox to show precisely which changes are required. I have pointed this out on numerous previous occasions, but people still persist on using code blobs in the talk page (whether using TextDiff or otherwise) which is both error-prone and untestable. Therefore,   Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 29 November 2024

edit

I just needed to add the icons for the two new operators of Mumbai Metro (MMMOCL and MMRC) who each operate yellow/red lines and aqua line respectively. This was done for Kolkata Metro in the past when it's East-West line (operated by KMRC and not MRK) opened, thus the KMRL logo was added as an icon. I feel it's pertinent that this error is contained as the current icon for Mumbai metro (MMOPL) only operates one line, the blue line. While MMMOCL and MMRC combined will operate over 10 lines together. Furthermore MMOPL might be dissolved and blue line handed over to MMMOCL, which would make the current icon completely irrelevant. Thus I request the editors to add the logos of MMMOCL and MMRC as icons. Thanks for your consideration. OSH10402 (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@OSH10402:   Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 4 December 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: Hi, Transjakarta has just reactivated a BRT line that went out of service a few months ago. I'd like to bring back the roundel for the interchange. Thank you. Mtlh01p (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 4 December 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: Hello, Transjakarta has just reactivated a BRT line that went out of service a few months ago. I'd like to make a modification to add the new route's roundel. Thank you. Mtlh01p (talk) 09:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Mtlh01p:   Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Please do not paste code blobs into this talk page. I have said this several times in the past. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply


Edit request 4 December 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: {{rint|us|greyhound}} uses an outdated logo ( ); Greyhound switched to its current navy blue/grey look over 10 years ago. Can anyone upload a new logo file (that still complies with WP:NFCC) for this icon? 162 etc. (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

No demos here please. That is what Template:Rail-interchange/testcases is for. Demos on this page frequently cause breakage. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is not a demo. This is a request for an image. 162 etc. (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
It appears that the reason this hasn't been updated is because the new logo, File:Greyhound UK logo.png, although used as non-free on four pages, is not available for use on Commons. This makes it unavailable for use in the rint template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 05:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, this is why I'm suggesting that a different image be uploaded. 162 etc. (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Understood, and until a different image is uploaded to Commons, no edit can be made to this template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 9 December 2024

edit

Per my most recent edits on the sandbox and testcases pages, I rearranged the modules for Adelaide according to mode and line order, as well as removed a redunduant duplicate depreciated module for the Tonsley line (now renamed the Flinders line) since they are one and the same. I also replaced the redirect links with direct links to each of their respective pages. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 09:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@OrdinaryScarlett: Looks fine, so   Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply