There's a merger proposal rgdg LeBaron group/Ch1stbornedit...Here: Talk:Church_of_the_Firstborn_of_the_Fulness_of_Times#Merger_proposal.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC) I invite you to improve consensus of ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC) March events and meetups in DCeditGreetings from Wikimedia DC! Looking for something to do in DC in March? We have a series of great events planned for the month:
Can't make it to an event? Most of our edit-a-thons allow virtual participation; see the guide for more details. Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at info@wikimediadc.org! Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC) You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list. TalkbackeditHello, BD2412. You have new messages at Mattlore's talk page.
Message added 20:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mattlore (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC) Old drafteditHello there. I was looking through old Draft space pages that hadn't been edited in a while and saw Draft:Fyodor Bogorodsky which you created over 2 years ago. Were you intending on coming back and finishing working on it to get it to acceptance? If not would you consider deleting it to not make a land grab claim on the title? If you don't respond back in one month I intend to nominate the page for deletion on the ground there is not one verified fact on the page. Hasteur (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Matt Peacock (Devil's Dust) listed at Redirects for discussioneditAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matt Peacock (Devil's Dust). Since you had some involvement with the Matt Peacock (Devil's Dust) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 16:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC) TalkbackeditHello, BD2412. You have new messages at Inwind's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Thank you for letting me know. If Subbotniks were not included in that discussion I would like to initiate such a discussion please. Could you point me to where that should taker place and who I should notify for involvement please? There is a lot of untidiness on this subject which could still be streamlined it seems. Best regards. YuHuw (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Article moveeditArticle keeps on being moved by newby accounts without consensus: Jack Carlson (ice hockey). May need some protection. --Midas02 (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Trump cards as primary topiceditMy rationale on pointing trump cards to the trump card dab page was that there was no clear primary topic -- should it be suit (cards), the most recent target before today? That seemed less like. Should it be Major Arcana, the suit of trump cards? Or should it be trump, which was the former target of trump card? (The last seems like actually the least appropriate choice, since it's a discussion of the concept of the singular trump card.) None of these seemed clearly unambiguous, so I directed it to the dab page. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
DabmentionseditWell, I learned something from you today... Haploidavey (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Two FootballerseditYou recently moved drafts on two English footballers from Draft space to article space. However, they indicate that the two players played in the Football League. In modern times, the Football League sometimes is and sometimes is not a first-tier league in accordance with association football notability guidelines, because the articles didn't indicate whether they were playing at the Football League Championship level. I moved the articles back into draft space and declined them, because otherwise they risked being nominated for Articles for Deletion. If they played at the first-tier level, please update the articles to indicate that clearly with a reliable source. Moving them back to draft space seemed less disruptive than risking having them nominated for deletion, because you can always edit the articles and resubmit them. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Pat Priest (judge) for deletioneditA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pat Priest (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Priest (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TacfuJecan (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Phantom EagleeditUnderstood. I goofed. I guess the cross universe frustration got the best of me. I think it should be about Marvel since the sources prove that Marvel is the primary topic. As for the Fawcett Comics character, there can be other options for his placement. I personally don't think a discussion would have been very active. There are such things as page moves that don't need consensus. But I agree that the last one I did could be considered controversial. My humbles apologies. Happy editing! Jhenderson 777 19:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
PMOY listed at Redirects for discussioneditAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PMOY. Since you had some involvement with the PMOY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Peter CareweditHi, another one to move. --Midas02 (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the PraeceptorIP (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Hi, started fixing these links. Turns out Global Christian Network (broadcaster) is the overwhelming primary topic. The only other option is a social network that packed in in 2001. Could you do the move? --Midas02 (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC) John HoodeditHi... again. A very junior editor has been moving a primary topic. I can see his point, but it merits an RM discussion. Can you quickly nip this one in the bud? I'd like to start a move discussion once the article's been shifted back. --Midas02 (talk) 03:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
PereiaeditCplakidas has done a cut-and-paste move of a dab page here. I guess the page history should be restored. Whether the 'Greek word' article should be the primary topic, I'm not convinced. On WP, the word will mostly be used for linking to a particular location, not to a description of its historical meaning. --Midas02 (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
"No consensus for a page move"editHi! I saw this reversal of my page move, which I wasn't aware of until now. Do you object to this move? The reason why I moved was to disambiguate between other German schools with the name "Humboldt" in Spanish speaking countries. I believe this is a reasonable move, and I can WP:Be Bold as long as it's not "reckless". I don't see how such a move is reckless, nor have I seen any previous discussion regarding this move. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Northern China (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussioneditAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Northern China (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Northern China (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC) Rewrite of lead at List of federal judges appointed by George W. BusheditI did a rewrite of the lead at List of federal judges appointed by George W. Bush as I felt the current lead was inaccurate. It formerly read:
It now reads:
The new lead makes it clear that while this is a comprehensive list of Article III Judges, it is only a partial list of Article I Judges and has no Article IV Judges included. The previous lead would lead somebody to believe that this list was a comprehensive list of ALL Federal Judges of all types, which is obviously not the case. Also, Bush made 327 Article III appointments, not 325, because the former lead omitted Trade Court appointments. I am running this by you (and one other frequent WikiProject USCJ contributor) for comment, before I make similar corrections to the other list articles. @Snickers2686: I am pinging you to read this, as you are a frequent contributor to WikiProject USCJ as well. You are welcome to comment on this as well. Safiel (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
St. John's warteditI'm not sure what you thought you were doing to "fix" my edits. But, in effect you have just added to the confusion by boldly moving it to a title it has never been at before. Yes, It's complicated. Are you familiar with Special:MergeHistory? I used that to address a dab-content fork. The dab was at St John's wort (disambiguation) and now that's redirecting to the primary topic which a (disambiguation) title shouldn't do. wbm1058 (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC) So hopefully you read the rest of the talk page before you submitted your RM. This all was started by the edits of the Man in Question, who created a good-faith fork of the original dab. I hist-merged in the older edits from November 2013 to January 2015. I guess the sight of the {{incoming links}} template upset you a bit, but can we at least propose a move to the most likely consensus title based on my analysis in the earlier section? wbm1058 (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Kentucky Supreme Court justiceseditWhile working on Walter Arnold Baker - just moved to main space - I noticed that there appears to be another missing justice that is not on your list. His name is William S. Cooper, though I'm not sure how best to disambiguate the article yet. BTW, Baker had a long career in the Kentucky General Assembly and only a brief tenure on the court, so I chose not to use "judge" as a disambiguator for him. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 18:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Not seeing this as an improvement, since its moving the pointer from a page to a redirect to that page, and one that contains an additional unnecessary word at that. Herostratus (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Line drivereditOddly, it looks like we have no reasonable article to link for the intended meaning of "line driver" in the Amplifier article, in spite of the semi-helpful words on the disambig page. Dicklyon (talk) 02:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC) I believe I will change Line driver to be an article. I don't think the distinction that it is drawing is very meaningful, but if it is it can fit in the article. Dicklyon (talk) 03:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Curious, why all the redlinks on Shelly Peiken? The last one, Lifeline by Anastacia is blue, but the rest are red. Three others, added by other editor(s), are red as well. It would seem that the list should be cut, maybe removing all of the songs w/o articles? Plz ping, Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Bitijula (April 19)edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
@Ringbang: I made no such submission, and I really don't know what you're talking about. bd2412 T 01:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Care to comment on this Broadcom discussion?editYou've shown an interest in Broadcom in the past so you might be interested in this Talk:Broadcom#Proposal to make two moves. Cheers! Talk to SageGreenRider 00:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC) A barnstar for you!edit
Dab challenge questioneditHi BD2412! Last month, you posted on my talk page that "As of now, there are 1,224 pages with more than 5 incoming links. If we can bring that number down by 225 before the end of the month, then we will have bridged the gap between the main list and the bonus list, and every single disambiguation link in Wikipedia at the beginning of May will count for the contest." Did that happen? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 23:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Tom HomereditHi, seeing as you're an administrator, I was wondering if you could move Tom Homer (rugby union) to Tom Homer? The rugby player is a lot more well known than the footballer. Thanks! APM (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)AmorPatiturMoras Participate in the Ibero-American Culture Challenge!editHi BD2412! Iberocoop has launched a translating contest to improve the content in other Wikipedia related to Ibero-American Culture. We would love to have you on board :) Please find the contest here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Translating_Ibero_-_America/Participants_2016 Hugs!--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC) courthouses in the U.S.edit
Contacting you as author of List of Federal courthouses in the United States. Would you do me the favor of promoting Draft:List of courthouses to mainspace? I previously submitted it to AFC but that isn't working...newish editors there fear that it is too large a topic, therefore infeasible or something. I know you know it is valid. I'd appreciate it. --doncram 22:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Working on Draft:List of courthouses in the United States now. I could very much use your consideration about various questions, re: coordination between Federal (which is divided by state, sorted by vs. County & other courthouse lists, and contents of each. Working first on Arkansas sub-list. Could you possibly please watch and participate at Draft talk:List of courthouses in the United States? Opening some questions there now. --doncram 21:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward FitzGerald Law (May 12)edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
You edited the article at least once. I invite you to ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Closing discussioneditCould you close a Requested move discussion on Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68) for the section titled "Requested move 6 May 2016"? Mitchumch (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC) FYI: Talk:Gunnar NelsoneditI have summoned you at Talk:Gunnar_Nelson#To_disambiguate_or_not_to_disambiguate. Your input would be appreciated. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC) U.S. Vice Pres.editA little help? Have two editors that want to play semantics regarding whether or not Veep is a member of the Senate. See talk page at article. Willing to defer to whichever way you go. -- Foofighter20x (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
About BD2412boteditPlease be advised, that BD2412bot is removing useful shared IP notice templates (schools, wifi hotspot, proxy) notices. Please consider leaving them behind when archiving the page.. Viewing all of the bot edits, and then reverting ones with shared IP notices is a lot of work, and the information is very useful.. even 7 years later. Thank you! --CoolCanuck eh? 04:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community SurveyeditThe Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Polbot FJC entries - pleased don't delete any for the time beingeditAs a background, in the last couple of days, I have been merging PolBot FJC entries and probably will concentrate on this particular task for the time being. However, when I was looking through the list of PolBot entries marked for deletion, I found one that was NOT entirely merged and noted that the user who marked the entry for deletion was NOT on the edit history for the corresponding judge article. So I am going to eyeball ALL of the Polbot entries marked for deletion to ensure they have actually been properly merged. I am notifying you on your talk page, since, as far as I know, your the only administrator aware of this particular deletion category and request that you do not delete anything from that category. Thanks and I will try to get through that as quick as possible. It shouldn't take me too long, as their are 50 entries total, of which 37 I need to check, the other 13 being ones I have merged and marked for deletion myself. I will notify you when I am done and it is safe to delete. Safiel (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
ආයුබෝවන් listed at Redirects for discussioneditAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ආයුබෝවන්. Since you had some involvement with the ආයුබෝවන් redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Uanfala (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Draft:Stewart G. PollockeditDraft:Stewart G. Pollock is not configured in such a way to move the page to an article space. Is there a reason?Djflem (talk) 05:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Title and name disambiguation pageeditHi. Your last few hundred edits putting pages into Category:Title and name disambiguation pages had the side-effect of removing the __DISAMBIG__ marker from those pages, and now they are not treated as disambiguation pages at all by the software. Was this intended? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering about your recent edit to the above. There is a Christchurch in Dorset in UK and the article shows Stiller to be active in the South of England. However the link as it stands currently goes to Christchurch in New Zealand and it is also known that Stiller has lived abroad at several times in his life. See Alan Jones (racing driver)#Formula One for one instance and the article also shows him in the US. If you have something that confirms his location please add to the article as appropriate. Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikimania 2016 is almost here! Mjohnson (WMF) and I are running two workshops for IdeaLab during the conference, and you are invited to join us for either (or both!) If you have a proposal or idea you are thinking about, and would like a space to work on it on your own or with others, please consider joining us for either the Thursday or Saturday sessions. We'll discuss a little about IdeaLab and how it works, and the rest of the time is space for idea building. You can also use this session to ask questions about Wikimedia Foundation grants that are available if your proposal or idea may need funding. Thanks, and see you at the conference! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC) promotionseditHi, I see you're going to Wikimania, congratulations and have fun. I visit to ask if you could promote and to mainspace, by moving them. There exist about 7 separate "List of county courthouses in STATE" articles now, and I would set up redirects from "List of county courthouses in STATE" to the corresponding section in the U.S. list for all the others. They're unfinished but fairly extensive and including all or nearly all NRHP-listed items. I personally think they're obviously mainspace-worthy. I would rather continue developing them in mainspace, so that others can find them and contribute to them also, instead of developing their own sandbox versions, duplicatively and yet formatted differently. I have just come across a sandbox version for a list of Texas ones, developed more than my new Draft:List of county courthouses in Texas, and have invited its author to move it to mainspace. I also came across a sandbox version of Florida ones. cheers, --doncram 23:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Pavel (disambiguation) for deletioneditA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC) NJ Supreme Court justiceseditstubs, unlikely to be greatly expanded……publish?====
Djflem (talk) 06:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Two more Djflem (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC) |