Wikipedia cannot be neutral

edit

I find that it is very hard, verging on impossible for wikipedia to actually follow its own guidelines on neutrality.

The basic rule is: Majority. That is all. And Majority votes (called "consensus") can trump neutrality every time.

I am a very busy person and I get paid lots of money for my time and efforts. I do not need to be wasting that expensive and valuable time on wikipedia, when just 5 biased people can unite to create a biased article and then protect it in that form.

So, I will only edit a bit here... not much.


My Original Welcome

edit

Welcome. I am Blue Tie. I appreciate your interest. You may get to know me a bit by seeing what I have worked on.

Email: wikipedias.BlueTie at Yahoo dot com (note that since I do not work here much, I almost never check that address any longer)

If, at any point in time, you and I are in some sort of dispute, please understand that I probably still respect you and I definitely do not hate you. So far, I have not met anyone on wikipedia who I did not feel was trying to do a good job. We may not agree on what a good job is, but that is no reason to make it a personal matter. Happy editing!

My Contributions

edit

Apparently I have 2780 Edits to date, with about half of those being in the Main Space. --Blue Tie 04:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

So far I have created 8 Articles:

So far I have created 1 Stub:

parthenos--Blue Tie 14:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (its gone now. Probably that's ok).


I have made what I consider to be significant contributions to the following pages:

Other pages of interest include:

edit
Getting Started
Rules about Contributions
Writing with Style
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

Tools

edit

Admin Bot

edit

With thanks to User:Gwernol

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)