Part of a series on |
Rhetoric |
---|
![]() |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Cassandra1.jpeg/220px-Cassandra1.jpeg)
Deermouse rhetoric is a place where unfathomable concepts are spoken in few words. e.g. Concepts spoken on typed pages linguistically heard or audibly read. Additionally, a document (this one), wherein it is a place. Furthermore, it's context concerns abstractions and as a foundational principal, consider Wikipedia:Rhetoric as additional reading for applying rhetoric within talk space. e.g.
Rhetoric has little use anywhere in Wikipedia, and should always be used with extreme caution.
Rhetoric is ancient.
Ancient Greece distinguished rhetoric, the art of reasoning persuasively, from logic, the art of reasoning correctly.
Finally, Visitor rhetoric is welcome after careful review of what this page is intended for, that being becoming the wikipedian inside of me.
Rhetoric or logic
editThe Cassandra (metaphor) (variously labelled the Cassandra '-syndrome', '-complex', '-phenomenon', '-predicament', '-dilemma', or '-curse') occurs when valid warnings or concerns are dismissed or disbelieved.
Consider citing policy.
In theory
editThe rhetoric of
edit- Citations of books - Name, Author's (1055). This Book. Earth: House Clearance. p. 3.
{{cite book}}
:|first=
has generic name (help) and reference[1]
I am inticed to read a book from,
- Compelling title,
- Coverart, with subsequent review of back-cover,
- Conversation about a book,
I am compelled to investigate a particular topic,
- Where numerous books contain references of subject matter citing the topic,
- When a book illuminates a compelling topic,
- There are differences in the acts of being compelled and being inticed,
I would most likely arrange my bookshelf order by category, I would most likely check the library catalogue,
- for other reading material about the topic,
- for authors
references
edit
Why hyperlinks fail
edit- Wicktionary:Intice
- Wicktionary:Compel
- Wicktionary/Thesaurus:investigate
- Wicktionary:Category
- Wicktionary:Cite
The rhetorical viewpoint
editDo I wish for a definition? Do I wish for an article within an encyclopedia? Do I wish for another context of the word? Do I wish for other words of the same meaning? Do I wish for opposing words to a debate (or other)? Perhaps what I need is a concise verbiage for peace of mind.
template(s) inserted
editrhetoric
editPart of a series on |
Rhetoric |
---|
(Template placed at header)
category:rhetoric
editSee also
editDiscourse
editWikipedia talk is the epitome of Discourse. Sometimes, when guidelines are not taken in due diligence, Wikipedia editors epitomize verbose discourse.
Semantics
editSemantics | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Semantics of programming languages | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Semantics are the crossroads of topical intervention and the array of directional signposts.
Additional material
editPossible hub of lingual nightmares
editIn relation to semantics a visual point of view induces perception of discord. This image brings to the mind a relative significance toward semantics.
Logic
editLogic as the other rhetoric as mentioned by the ancient Greeks above.