EelamStyleZ

Welcome!

Hello, EelamStyleZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kailash29792 (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Getting back to business?

Eh? —Vensatry _(talk) 06:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes my friend. Not as much as before, but here and there. Hope everything has been good on your end. EelamStyleZ (talk) 04:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I wonder what made you consider WP:VANISH. Anyway, it's good to see you back. I'm good and btw Enthiran is an FA! —Vensatry _(talk) 02:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations! I've kept up with most articles while not editing. They all look really good! EelamStyleZ (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Care to explain?

What's with this edit, where you change the gross of Kabali to a value that's not supported by the reference? The reference says it cleared 250 crore, not 300. It's making a prediction that it will clear 300. Feel free to explain below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I forgot to include the source, but I see you've removed it earlier under valid grounds. EelamStyleZ (talk) 23:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Introducing errors into Toronto rapid transit

Hi, I noticed you added several errors to the article. Specifically "After the completion of Line 5 Eglinton, the city considers two other light rail lines to be constructed in the north of the city." This is not true. The Finch line will be under construction 5 years before the Crosstown is scheduled to be completed.

There are 3 approved extensions in the city, Spadina , Crosstown, and Finch West. The Scarborough subway is now into "research stage" which has not been approved. There is no alignment, no EA complete, and the official website reflects this: "The Scarborough Subway Extension is part of a rapid transit solution for Scarborough that is currently being studied. - See more at: http://www.scarboroughsubwayextension.ca/#sthash.hNepnqwa.dpuf". Please be careful to include statements backed up with sources. Mattximus (talk) 17:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Scarborough Subway Extension is funding approved. The alignment option has been set, but an EA is yet to be complete. Finch West and Sheppard East are under a similar status. These are not errors but rather issues in categorization. — EelamStyleZ (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Not true, the alignment has not been set for the Scarborough subway, the options are being researched with a report due near the end of the year (see official website source I gave you). The Finch West planning is complete and preparations for it's construction are underway. As far as progress goes, Finch West is essentially begun, however Sheppard East and Scarborough are very much up in the air. They would be errors in categorisation, correct. Scarborough might not even get started this decade...! Mattximus (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Yonge–Eglinton

Hi there. I reverted your edits to Yonge–Eglinton. Because you left no edit summaries I had no idea why you were removing and adding information. If you could please leave a short description of why you made each of your edits it helps other editors understand what you are doing. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

You've reverted several clean ups and restored trivial information that were unsourced. — EelamStyleZ (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

You are making big changes with inadequate or totally absent explanation

The wikipedia is a cooperative project. The rest of us are entitled to expect you to not only have a reasonable explanation for your edits, but also to provide that explanation. When the edit you have in mind is large, or far-reaching, you should probably pause, and provide the explanation as to why you think it is in order, on the article's talk page first.

Magnolia677 specifically draw this to your attention with regard to Yonge-Eglinton. I do the same with regard to Eglinton LRT Carhouse. You excised most of the article, with the inadequate explanation "rm trivial info already covered in other articles".

As I pointed out, on Talk:Eglinton LRT Carhouse, if you think the information you excised was more properly covered in related articles, why didn't you provide links to those related articles?

You moved 501 Queen, 504 King, 514 Cherry, and the other dozen or so related articles on TTC streetcar lines to a new name, without discussing your initiative with anyone else first. Your explanation? You asserted this moves of yours would avoid confusing readers who might think the articles were about street addresses.

It is an inadequate explanation. First, the original names weren't of the form 501 Queen Street -- so they didn't really look like street addresses. Second, 501 Queen Street, or any of the other addresses you seem to be claiming could be a source of confusion, are not notable addresses. "999 Queen Street West" used to be the street address of a mental health hospital. When I was a kid, kids would refer to the address, without explicitly spelling out that it was a "loonie bin", when trying to insult other kids. Geo Swan (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I shall provide reasons for each below:

1) The Eglinton Maintenance and Storage Facility page was written with poorly worded statements, as can be seen in the comparison link you provided. I cut down on most of it to reduce the article down to just clearly sourced information. I've added a stub template at the end so that it can be kept as an article to be expanded on a later date. The same was done with Yonge-Eglinton. My focus was on quality, not quantity.

2) The streetcar route articles were moved to include "route" in their names to keep them consistent with current rapid transit line article titles (like Line 1 Yonge-University} and, in general, many other public transport route article titles. There are many buildings in Toronto addressed in a similar fashion (10 Dundas East, One Bloor) without the word "street" in them. I've requested icons for each streetcar route number (as featured on the TTC website) on the Template talk:rail-interchange page.

I apologize for the wide-spread changes, but I feel its a step in the right direction to keep the large collection of TTC articles clean. — EelamStyleZ (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

I moved 501 Queen street back to the original as I've never heard the term "route 501 Queen" before. I think if you want to change it to make it more clear "501 Queen streetcar route" would be a more precise name. Calling it "route 504 King" sounds very awkward and I've never heard them called that before. Mattximus (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

My rationale for calling it "route 5XX (name)" is because the TTC does refer to its other bus routes in the same fashion. Also, as stated before, it's consistent with the rapid transit line titles. Basically any rail route in Toronto would be titled in the format "Route/Line # (route name)". I think "5xx (name) streetcar route" format is lengthy. EelamStyleZ (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

I suggest we must inform Wikipedia:WikiProject Streetcars about this ongoing debate. They will decide whether the moves are justified or not. In this case, they might not be. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

• Well, really, the explanations belong on the talk page. For big changes, or controversial changes, the discussion should precede the actual change.

There is an essay, WP:BRD -- which I think contains bad advice. It is a big trigger for edit warring. I spent time trying to figure out if you were a sockpuppet. Eglinton LRT Carhouse was recently nominated for deletion. It was a long drawn-out AfD.

The kind of radical and unexplained informationectomy and referencectomy you performed? It is pretty common for someone to make that kind of edit in an attempt to undermine the article so they could justify an {{A7}} speedy-deletion, due to no references, and no assertion of notability. I am glad to learn that wasn't your intention. But if you follow the bad advice of BRD like this again, please realize you will trigger concerns over vandalism.

You wrote that you had concerns the Carhouse article "was written with poorly worded statements, as can be seen in the comparison link you provided." The diff I provided showed a radical excision. I don't see the diff establishing a need to reword poorly worded statements.

If you thought particular sentences needed to be rewritten, you could, of course, have waited, until you were ready to rewrite them. As above, the reason for not gutting an article, and then re-writing it, later, is that the gutted article is vulnerable to speedy deletion, under {{A7}}, or similar.

You also voiced a concern that the article wasn't "clearly sourced". Woah! You should discuss these concerns on the talk page! What if, for instance, your concern was the naive notion that Steve Munro was just a blogger, not an RS?

Well, if you had a google news alert on him, you would see that the transportation reporters for all the local papers lap up his detailed, methodical, well informed analysis. They defer to him. They clearly recognize his expertise. Since transportation reporters cite him, and not vice versa, he is clearly a highly authoritative source.

Anyone could make a naive mistake like this. This is why it is essential to be more cautious, to be more cooperative, and voice your concern on the talk page, or the user talk of the contributor who made the edit that concerned you.

Because of the danger of {{A7}} I am going to rewind your informationectomy to the Carhouse article. Geo Swan (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

a heads-up

You called the Eglinton Crosstown a "metro" line. Why?

Those who have an iron in the fire will try to redefine their products, when there is a fad. When I was in University there were two diametrically opposed design philosophies for computer CPUs, the complex instruction set computer, and the "Reduced Instruction Set Computer" (aka RISC). RISC architectures had the cachet, so you saw the spokesmen of CISC computer companies claiming "our computers incorporate RISC-like elements!"

Who told you that the Bombardier Flexity Freedom vehicles were metro class vehicle? Sometimes you will see light rail systems called "light metro" systems. Vancouver's SkyTrain is sometimes called a "light metro" system. So is London's Dockland's Light Rail system.

But those systems don't run down the middle of a street, as the Eglinton line will do, east of the DVP. They don't cross arterial road intersections, at grade, where they can be impeded by garden variety fender-benders.

It is my understanding that, in theory, the Flexity Freedom vehicle, when mated with a fully grade separated right of way, and controlled by a modern control system, could carry as many passengers as the SkyTrain. It is my understanding that trainsets on a fully grade separated right of way, with a modern control system, can be run every 90 seconds, or less. But, when the vehicles share intersections with regular autos, that means trainsets can't be run as frequently. The Crosstown will be the first line in Toronto where the traffic lights change to give transit vehicles a green light. Trainsets can't run so frequently that they hog the intersection.

So, it is definitely not a metro system, it is not even a light metro system. Geo Swan (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

I have never referred to the Eglinton line as a metro or light metro line. I know it's a light rail line, as I clearly wrote in the Line 5 Eglinton article itself. Elsewhere, I probably referred to the underground stations that it will operate in or alluded to its inclusivity in the Toronto rapid transit, which is a full-fledged metro system. You're free to make necessary corrections. EelamStyleZ (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Better still, you could call it a hybrid system. Take a look at how German Stadtbahn systems are designed - as underground "light metro" in the central sections and as surface-level "light rail" in the outer sections. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

• Yeah, sorry, but if you re-check your recent edits to Mount Dennis station you'll see you did in fact leave a lead sentence that said "metro". Geo Swan (talk) 01:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm FuriouslySerene. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Downsview Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A federally owned park is not the same thing as a national park, so perhaps you were mistaken with the edit. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalyan Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit summary request

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 14:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Kannathil Muthamittal

Hi there, this is a weird addition. Firstly, it's unsourced, which is problematic, but it's also odd, because virtually everything can be a "first" if you set up the right criteria for it. If it was the first Indian film to appear in the film festival, would that be noteworthy? Not necessarily. Not unless the festival had been restricted to Canadian films or something, and they made an exception for India because X film was so great. If nobody from India had entered a film, then one year an Indian film was submitted and got in, is that an accomplishment? And I struggle to think of examples where we would focus on the "first" achieved by a specific ethnic group. What was the first African-American film to be shown at the Toronto Film Festival? Do we even know? Is it relevant? We tend to focus on nations, not sub-divisions within those nations. So I'm unclear on what the rationale is for including it other than as promotion for the Tamil ethnicity. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EelamStyleZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Toronto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerrard Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Could you revert the Wikipedia page Ancaster, Hamilton, Ontario back to Ancaster, Ontario

Hi EelamStyleZ

I see that you redirected (moved) the Wikipedia Ancaster, Ontario page to Ancaster, Hamilton, Ontario on 28-Feb-2017 and that you did the same for a few but not all of the town Wikipedia sites that were amalgamated with Hamilton. Could you please revert the Wikipedia page back Ancaster, Ontario. If you would like to redirect this page in the future could you put some information in the Ancaster Wikipedia talk section so that this can be discussed and a possible consensus reached? Otherwise I'll revert it myself eventually but I'd prefer it if you did because I've never attempted this before.

m (EelamStyleZ moved page Ancaster, Ontario to Ancaster, Hamilton, Ontario) 28-Feb-2017

And I see Magnolia677 below has the identical question about another link you redirected in the same fashion recently.

Thanks Kent --Beatles1959 (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Aldershot, Burlington, Ontario

Why did you move Aldershot, Ontario to Aldershot, Burlington, Ontario? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Aldershot merged with Burlington and no longer a separate municipality in Ontario. As such, it is only appropriate to have it under its current jurisdiction (i.e. Mount Hope, Hamilton, Ontario; Scarborough, Toronto). EelamStyleZ (talk) 16:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I have moved the pages to just Aldershot, Burlington and Mount Hope, Hamilton as it would be awkward to have titles like Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario or if you want to be even crazier, Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada... you get the idea. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Why This Kolaveri Di, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3 (2012 film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EelamStyleZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

"Tamil-language" vs "Tamil language"

Hi there, re: these changes, when we are speaking about the Tamil language, we would write it "Tamil language", because Tamil describes the language. That is why the article about the Tamil language is titled that. But if you are describing a film as a Tamil-language film, that is typically hyphenated, because "Tamil-language" is a connected idea that describes the film. Same with English-language film, or Spanish-language film. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Kaala cast, mithun rajakumar, addition in wikipedia

Hi, there is a addition in kaala cast a credit, mithun rajakumar has been credited as a kaala's grandson in 10th place in IMDB. Please check imdb page of kaala movie.I would request your to add Mithun Rajakumar name in wikipedia page of Kaala cast credit.Thanks Vannacharal (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Inappropriate current tag

Hi i removed this tag you placed[1] due to wrong use of current template. he is dead due to old age natural causes and illness, this is no longer a current event no death related news is unreliable.--DBigXray 22:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at R. Sarathkumar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

TTC Subway

Hi I just wanted to let you know why your edit was reverted. The Toronto Subway only serves two cities in the GTA, Toronto and Vaughan. No other cities in the GTA have a subway, nor are any planned. It may one day reach Richmond Hill if the Yonge line is extended North, but this is just hypothetical. Mattximus (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Faith Goldy. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EelamStyleZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2.0 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

"Mixed to positive"

Hi there, re: this, "mixed to ___" phrasing is shunned by multiple WikiProjects, including WP:FILM. "Mixed" already means "positive and negative", so "mixed to positive" would mean "positive and negative to positive". The more important issue, is that you are not a critical response aggregator, and it is not your job to add your personal opinion or evaluation to articles. Finding a five star review doesn't shift the "mixed" summary to some new description, because as I said "mixed" already means "positive and negative". Stick to what reliable sources say, please, and please don't editorialise. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Loosu ponnu

Hi, would you be willing to improve this article? --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamilton GO Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bus terminal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Pray for Nesamani

Hi, Thank you for your contribution to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athlour (talk • contribs) 14:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scarborough Health Network into Birchmount Hospital. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you Athlour (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central business district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buffalo Niagara International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saaho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Basic stuff

Eelam, re: this, I'm not sure how you differentiate an action film from an action drama, but typically speaking, action films are dramas, and I don't think we need the extra wording. We also don't need the extra wording of saying that the film stars X, Y and Z "in the lead roles. "Stars" are typically the leads of a film, barring some special circumstances. Lastly, when adding Wikilinks, the primary topic for "Telugu film" is the language Telugu, not the ethnic industry. Not everybody across the world knows what "Telugu" or "Tamil" or "Malayalam" or "Odia" is, and the first step to educating them is to point to the language. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for Feedback

Hi User:EelamStyleZ! I have made some changes to the Transit (app) page which I see you contributed to in 2018. I am a student working in an online communities course and would love any feedback you have to the changes I have made and the information I added to the article. Thank you! -MichelleBir. (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Parentheticals

Hi there, re: this, random parentheticals are not terribly helpful, as there's often no clear way to understand what the content means. Character descriptions should be written in complete sentences. And normally when indicating a nickname, you would use quotations if we were using a full name, like Michael Gerard "Iron Mike" Tyson. That's not easy to do with one-named characters, so we need a smarter work-around. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Idiyappam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hopper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

How are you doing?

Been a long time! :) —Vensatry _(talk) 07:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Penguin

If the film is bilingual, then the languages should be indicated in the filmography.TamilMirchi (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

G Priyavignesh

G Priyavignesh Please improve this article. Thanks

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mattamy Homes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Markham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Babu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited McMaster University Bus Terminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bus terminal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

dear wiki friend

dear friend kuruvi, sura and puli fall under superhero roles. they are supernatural stunts in those films. It's quite obvious. Thanks. Firewaterair (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dundas Street bus rapid transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burlington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ponnambalam Arunachalam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transportation in Toronto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pongal (dish), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pongal (dish), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iman Vellani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Markham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the 2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niagara Falls station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharatanatyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Kothu roti

The correct location would be Kottu roti not Kothu roti as that is its more common usage. Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Your recent editing history at Kothu roti shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dan arndt (talk) 07:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Well then I invite you to a discussion at Talk:Kothu roti instead of reverting good faith edits. Stop blindly mass reverting my edits. EelamStyleZ (talk) 07:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy to do so however none of your edits are supported by any reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Needs to be fully discussed/debated before you make controversial changes and moves like you have done. Dan arndt (talk) 07:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Contoversial how? The only editor contesting is you. EelamStyleZ (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Simply because you have not given anybody else the chance to debate or discuss this!! 07:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Well you are welcome to debate. Just stop reverting the next second I make a change. You’re just resorting to a lame edit war, not to mention quick to blame me as one. EelamStyleZ (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

You are the one that started the edit war - which is why I placed an under construction tag on the article, which you have consistently ignored - as well as the comments on the article's talk page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

You can’t just revert good faith clean up edits and then accuse me for edit warring. Also, you are not being ignored. Refer to the article’s talk page. EelamStyleZ (talk) 08:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

If an examination of the sources in an article shows that one name or version of the name stands out as clearly the most commonly used in the English language, we should follow the sources and use it. Dan arndt (talk) 08:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kottu

A tag has been placed on Kottu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

deleting to make be able to move Kothu roti to this title

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 07:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Question

Did Vijay Sethupathi reshoot all his Jawan scenes in Tamil? DareshMohan (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello

I just wanted to say hi. I noticed that you are a Eelam Tamil and I love the way you guys speak Tamil. How's life? DareshMohan (talk) 05:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Purolator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

People mover edit

Hi there, still not understanding this edit of yours: why are you removing apparently factually correct information from the article? Jpatokal (talk) 10:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)