Wikipedia editor
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jerome_Charles_Potts. |
Jerome Charles Potts
Name | This user wants his name to be confidential. | XXX |
666
|
This user has 6 letters in each of his three names.
|
| This user has too much time on their hands. |
| This user has no understanding of time and does everything at the last minute. |
| This user loves deadlines. He loves the whooshing sound they make as they go by. |
|
The rest
|
Subj
|
This user prefers that the subjunctive mood be used. Were this user you, he would use it.
|
to too two | This user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two. |
its & it's | This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you. |
their there they're | This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling! |
’s | Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice. |
A, B, and A and B | This user uses the serial comma unless its inclusion is confusing. |
Mix | This user has been influenced by too many dialects of English to use one orthography, vocabulary and grammar consistently. |
|
- I am a believer of Michel Potay's Revelation of Arès, and, accordingly, of theistic evolution.
- February 6, 2007: I just read, for the first time, the Iraqi insurgency page, and i am astonished by the lousiness of that article. And i'm not even a news junkie, far from it. I found copyright violation + a load of bullshit (unsubtantiated "information") which makes me think that the page is not monitored very well, and that to my great surprise.
...which follows by this rant:
Warning to the reader
edit
O reader, you should beware of what you read in here. How to sort it out ? Well, if an article has a good number of footnotes, themselves pointing to a bibliography, and the associated discussion page is interesting/impressive to read, then you can trust most of what you are finding (go have a look at WP:SOURCES). Otherwise, do your own homework. But don't be too disappointed, because what's in here helps you with that.
So, when you stumble across a web site which copies the Wikipedia entries regardless of quality, such as http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/, you should turn around and run the other way. Either those people are stupid, or they count on you to be stupid, to take advantage of you. I suspect it is both: they count on you to be stupid, to take advantage of you, and that is stupid.
End of warning to the reader
edit
- Oh, yeah, i forgot: "No soup for you!". One day i'll be him. ...et ma vengeance sera terrible!