User talk:Malcolmxl5/Archive 15

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

A barnstar for you!

	Police Barnstar
	Thank you for blocking all these vandals! Firestar464 (talk) 04:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hoopoe

Howdy, just a heads-up: Hoopoe is not about a species, but about the family / genus. The current short description is thus appropriate (or at least more appropriate than "Species of bird". Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs)

My bad. Thanks for letting me know. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Opinion

What is your opinion on overturning this per the discussion here?. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Administrator changes

John M Wolfson

Bduke • Nilfanion • Philosopher • Rspeer • Yunshui

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes

EdJohnston • Oshwah • Yamla

Yunshui

Oversight changes

Anarchyte

Yunshui

Guideline and policy news

• Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

Technical news

• Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
• Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
• Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.

Arbitration

• The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
• The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.

Miscellaneous

• A reminder that standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. (American Politics 2 Arbitration case).

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of G. K. Reddy (producer)

Hi, kindly help me with the recovery of this page [G. K. Reddy (producer)] as I saw that you had deleted it. I'd like to apologize for adding information about the person G. K. Reddy without the required references since I was not aware that Wikipedia functions with data that requires citation. Since this person doesn't have proper recorded information for most of his accomplishments, the final version of the wiki page that was online, was posted with the right citations and references, so kindly help me with recovering this page or fixing it for this person as he is a veteran film producer in Tamilnadu and also an emerging Fitness enthusiast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragunath Shanmugam (talk • contribs) 09:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Wikipedia summarises what is written about a subject in high quality sources - sources that are reliable, independent of the subject and cover the subject in-depth - and which are cited in the article. If you can bring forward high quality sources about G. K. Reddy then we can consider this further. In the meantime, the article has been picked up by the EverybodyWiki where such things are less important: you can find it at G. K. Reddy (producer). Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I'm hereby attaching some informational links of G. K. Reddy (producer) for your reference. [1], [2], [3]. Moreover, he is the father of prominent South Indian actor Vishal [4]. Currently, the existing page G. K. Reddy refers to an Indian Journalist who has passed away in 1987 and that actor Vishal is his son. Do help us sort out this misinterpretation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.251.35.78 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

By high quality sources, we mean reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, that cover the subject in depth.

You put forward three sources: the 'book my show' website does not appear to be reliable or independent nor is it in-depth; I am unsure of the provenance of E Times and India Today, but these tell us very little other than Vishal and his father GK Reddy have recovered from coronavirus and that GK Reddy has a fitness routine and so these are not in-depth.

That GK Reddy is the father of Vishal may be appropriate to include in the personal life section on the page for Vishal (actor) where Vishal’s brother is already mentioned, and I suggest you add some text about him there. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Alexander Marxer

A few months ago an article about Alexander Marxer, the footballer from Liechtenstein, was deleted as he did not yet have any caps for the national team and therefore didn't meet notability criteria. Since then he has now got his first cap, so he now meets eligibility and because of this a page has been created for him. However, if I recall correctly, the earlier deleted page had a lot more detail on it, so it would be beneficial to replace the page with the previously deleted version. Thanks SpookySpaghetti (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi SpookySpaghetti, I have restored the deleted history to the page. If you look there, you can take whatever you think appropriate from a previous version and edit the current version in the normal way. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the assistance --SpookySpaghetti (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Tanuj khatri

Hi i want to restore wikipedia page Tanuj khatri which is deleted because there is no reliable english sources mentioned in that article, maximum sources are from hindi language and all those sources are very reputed sources. i requets your to kindly look into that article again --Ziyush (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

The consensus at the deletion discussion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri - was quite emphatic. What has changed? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Mark Spalding

Hi, looking at the Rangers u20/Youth page and realised this staff member had been removed. Would be good for Rangers Fans to be able to review staff and find out more about them. 86.169.106.205 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. You can read about Mark Spalding here: Mark Spalding (football coach). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Storehippo

Hi Malcom, I just noticed that you had deleted Storehippo's wikipedia page. May you share the reason behind the deletion so we can rectify it? StoreHippo is the top SaaS E-commerce platform in India and MiddleEast (only next to Shopify) and powers a number of leading brands. If there was a concern about the content on the page then please do share that.

Rajiv22 (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Do I detect that you are employed by or connected in some way to Storehippo? If so, please read WP:COI before going any further. Regarding the article, it was deleted following a discussion; to put it simply, the company did not meet Wikipedia’s criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. However, all is not lost as the article now lives at EverybodyWiki and HandWiki and I would suggest editing the article there. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, resumed IP vandalism

Hello Malcolmxl5, in August you helpfully protected Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions from persistent vandalism. The protection just expired and unfortunately the vandalism has resumed. And of the same type and same source (Hialeah, Florida; Comcast) as before. The vandal has now also targeted List of codes used in the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions. Thanks, Declangi (talk) 06:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Declangi. I have blocked the IP for six months following two previous blocks for the same behaviour and also protected Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, their favoured target, for six months. I’ve watchlisted List of codes used in the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

Administrator changes

Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020

Interface administrator changes

Izno

Guideline and policy news

• There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.

Technical news

• Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hermann Göring

Thanks for the protection! Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem. :) Two blocks handed out too. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Backlinks

Re: this edit, when the deletion is because an entity never was a town, you should remove the entry entirely, not just the link. Geschichte (talk) 09:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

My bad, thanks for fixing it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Execuse Me?

Can You Please Unlocked Home Alone I Editing Screenplay and Story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreiroo01 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

The page has been protected on request due to disruptive editing over the last few days. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

And... you’ve been CU blocked, Andrei. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks, and the same to you, Donner60. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Tomáš Souček

Thanks for the explanation here! I should've figured that multiple IPs wouldn't have had the same hive mind. One of the more confusing cases of disruption I've come across.

Sdrqaz (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Ha, yes! It was weird. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 15:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, OrangeMike. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Administrator changes

Hammersoft

Andres • Brion VIBBER • Rkitko • Thatcher

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek • Primefac

Oversight changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek

Joe Roe

Guideline and policy news

• Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.

Technical news

• You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.

Arbitration

• By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
• Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

CallMeCarson

Hi. You correctly closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CallMeCarson as delete a few months ago. However, we now again have a (very poor) article at CallMeCarson, and it llooks as if the person has been widely in the news in the last few days, for some highly controversial reasons[5]. If it could be worthwhile to have the previous contents to develop the current page, could you please undelete it? If there is nothing remotely useful in the history, then of course don't bother. Fram (talk) 15:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Fram: Ew. So what have we got? A young YouTuber who broke up with his girlfriend last year and about whom allegations of an unpleasant kind have recently been made, covered in the scandal rags of course. Not much to pin an encyclopaedia article on, is it? The deleted article is a three-line lead, a one-line summary of of his YouTube 'career', sourced to YouTube naturally, and two lines about his girlfriend cheating on him. To be honest, I think it would be best to leave this one alone on the basis that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. It has been deleted as the original poster didn't bother turning it into an actual article. While the "mainstream" media about this were rubbish (Newsweek, Sun), I have no idea about the reliability and seriousness of the many more specialized sources about this kind of topic which were available in Gnews as well, so I thought it better to keep the article around and let people with more knowledge of this expand it (but keeping an eye out for BLP violations and so on). E.g. on Dexerto a whole series of articles were written about the situation, but is Dexerto in any way noteworthy and reliable? Anyway, thanks for looking into this. Fram (talk) 08:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Sebplayzzz

Hey, need block it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CloudBubble2026 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done A vandalism-only account. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Mason County, Michigan

Can you semi-protect this associated article also. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Draft:kanz and muhul

Need review Hashim Tariq bhat (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

This was reviewed yesterday by Curb Safe Charmer. It looks as though it needs just one more high-quality source, a source that describes the topic in depth, like the Kasmir Life one. It doesn’t have to be in English. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Lev

Hi. Thanks for taking care of Levwashere levi may. It's pretty clear from their similar nonsense that Levwashere is the same user, if you want to do something with that as well. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 05:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Ah, yes. Blocked that too. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1002810813 doesn't seem to have anything to do with acceptable talk page usage. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 07:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hmmm, no. I have removed their talk page access and cleared their talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hedgehog has socks

Please watch his data carefully. Shinyedit^bonjour. 22:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

I saw that. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes

Hog Farm

Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes

Berean Hunter • Xeno

Oversight changes

Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration

• The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Questions about The Strap-Ons

Hello Malcolmxl5,

I have some questions because I posted a different version of a wikipedia article that was removed. I understand why it was removed and sorry for the extended delay and have created a totally revamped article which I believe has resolved the issues of proving notability and providing citations.

My first question is, did I post it in the proper way so that you can review it. If not, let me know the correct procedure. If it is okay the way I have posted it, can you please review it and give suggestions on how to improve it to follow wikipedia guidelines and rules.

I have gained a lot of information through this experience: the importance of providing citations that show notability. I appreciate your help in this matter and look forward to hearing from you with recommendations on proper procedures to follow and ways to improve the article.

Thanks, Brian D. Diederich Brianddiederich (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Brianddiederich: Hi, Brian. For bands, I like to see a bio and for this, a few in-depth, high quality sources will do a great job; three is often enough as long as they are in some depth. The Johnny Loftus one in AllMusic is a fairly decent one; if there are other in-depth profiles of the band in books, e.g. encyclopaedias of rock or punk music, or in quality music magazines, or in quality newspapers, it would be good to have these too. The other thing, and you’ve probably noticed a tag on the page, is that we prefer articles to be written by someone who is not close to the subject; see WP:COI. Not the end of the world of course, the article can always be rewritten by someone else. P.S. I see the original article was picked up by the EverybodyWiki when it was deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision deletion

Since you had already hidden a recent edit on the page, could you please hide Special:Diff/1004976029 as well? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@1234qwer1234qwer4: Ah, yes. One of our regulars.  Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Next one. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Yep. He’s persistent!  Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for blocking the LTA and revdeleting the edit summaries. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem, hadn’t come across this one before. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Continued concern over University of Reading

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know there still may be concerns over the University of Reading page protections you put in place (and I requested). There seem to be new accounts ready to take on their fight, and who've turned their attention to my talk page. Just thought you should be warned, not that I expect you haven't seen this sort of stuff before. Shadowssettle _{Need a word?} 20:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Shadowssettle: Noted, thank you. Keep well. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, the new account has continued to go on (and on) on my talk page, which I removed because I don't need that. When I checked for continued vandalism, I saw they've taken to editing (in a far less disruptive manner) Robert Van de Noort instead. I tried to be constructive and incorporate their edits using reliable sources rather than synthesising and ORing a non-independent letter, but wouldn't mind a second pair of eyes to make sure I'm not just reverting for nothing. Shadowssettle _{Need a word?} 16:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

It looks like a good revert to me, Shadowssettle. I’ve put the page on my watchlist and will look closer. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Sus69420

Hello admin, you might want to block Sus69420. --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Korea origin theory

Hello. I am a Wikipedia user from South Korea. I have a message to tell you about the "Korea origin theory" document. First of all, I apologize for the use of rude expressions in the document by some of the excited Koreans. I would like to inform you that "Korea origin theory" document was created and deleted several years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/South_Korean_cultural_claims_(2nd_nomination) please read this record.

There have been several cultural disputes between South Korea and China in recent years, and some Chinese has written this document to demean Korea. This document is not neutral and the evidence is poor. Most of the sources are Chinese and Japanese articles, and even those are poorly documented. Please, I sincerely ask you to delete this document with your authority. Thank you for reading. Sushgmjj2020 (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

It is eleven years since the last deletion discussion so it will need to go through another. Someone has already nominated it for deletion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

About notable residents without Wikipedia pages

Hello. You recently removed my link to Edwin Symonowicz as a notable resident of Dolina Jadwigi and provided a comment: 'Notable people' means people who have an article on Wikipedia. This person does not have an article. However, why then several Wikipedia city pages have several people in their 'notable people' sections with no articles on Wikipedia and no one removes them? For example, look Łobez - of all 6 notable residents, only 1 has his Wikipedia page! And even no references! If it's so, why then I can't write about my favourite Polish singer Edwin Symonowicz on his hometown page with clear reliable reference (wide-known book) that he was born there and is notable enough? --Birdsflyinghigh123 (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

If Edwin Symonowicz is notable then it shouldn’t be difficult for you to write a Wikipedia compliance article about him. While you are here, please explain why you added Edwin Symonowicz to the list of heads of Fettes College here and why you created an article about a 15-year old boy? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Per WP:CITSTRUCT, if a person doesn't have an article then they don't get included. If they're notable the first step is to create and article and then link them. Canterbury Tail talk 15:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I can explain. At the first time, I'm sorry for Fettes College mistake. It was not an intended hoax, I saw the wrong reference that Symonowicz was one of this college headteacher's in Web and realized that it's fake info only after I made my change into Wikipedia. Now about Frank Mortenson. You think 15-year old boy can't be included in Wiki only because of his age? He is from the same generation like Roksana Węgiel and Viki Gabor - they are also 15-year old, but they are Polish singers. The same about Frank Mortenson. --Birdsflyinghigh123 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Age is no barrier to inclusion, just notability. Basic notability is having a page created and accepted with appropriate references establishing that notability. Some links that may help you along the path to creating these articles. WP:DRAFT, WP:REFERENCE, WP:NOTABILITY. If you read through some of the links in the Welcome message on your talk page (the big box at the top) we can have you well on your way to writing notable articles in no time. Canterbury Tail talk 15:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Birdsflyinghigh123 (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Need any guidance, feel free to drop a note on my talk page. Canterbury Tail talk 15:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, Malcolmxl5 here will also be willing to assist in anyway. Don't mean to step on your toes here. Canterbury Tail talk 16:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Win98fan (talk) 02:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

George MacKay

LTA would probably be for the best; I just came upon this all looking at AIV, but the master seems intent on long-term disruption affecting multiple pages. Nate • (chatter) 03:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I’ll try and find some time to draft up an LTA report in my user space. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure this user is the same one who targeted Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu in 2017; you protected the page once. They've just changed targets.Crboyer (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

So I did, I’d long forgotten about Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu. I think you’re right it’s the same person; all the IPs geolocate to Perugia Province, that’s too much of a coincidence. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Italian Troll past targets

Now that I'm on my laptop, I can pull up some more examples of this user's history. A few highlights:

• • Guillermo Del Toro
  • Alfonso Cuaron
  • Barry Jenkins
  • Jordan Peele
  • Mahershala Ali
  • Hidden Figures
  • Franklin Leonard (a recent one-off, but their wording...)
  • Here they are "predicting" The Big Sick's box office chances.
  • Blockers

I think that should be enough for now. Crboyer (talk) 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Ugh, I think I’m going to revision delete a few of those. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aamer Manzoor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aamer Manzoor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Störm (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

It needs to go. Both of the articles it once disambiguated have been deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Admin's Barnstar
		With appreciation for your assistance protecting numerous articles from vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Stephen Akintayo for improvement

I have gone through the article Stephen Akintayo and after a deep review of the mentioned article, I have gathered that the article is worthy of being on the Wikipedia mainspace. Similarly, it was okay that you removed it as it was previously posted by a lax editor thereby making it shoddy and inapt to stay on Wikipedia.

I have gone to revamp and recreate the article and minimise it to fit into the Wikipedia guidelines and also provided reliable, published sources and inline citation to it. I will be glad to have this resolved in the soonest. Thank you. Mrniger (talk) 08:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. The article has been deleted twice after deletion discussions, rightly so on review. If you are going to recreate it you will need multiple high-quality sources that discuss the subject in depth. What are your three best sources? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

RevDel zalgo

Can you hide all the edit summaries and this one edit completely made by the IP 176.72.46.205? Especially if one of the pages the IP edited is currently on the main page. Thanks. theinstantmatrix (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

TJMSmith

Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
• A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
• A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
• There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

• When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
• When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
• There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

• By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
• The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit Summary Scratch-out request

Hi. Could you scratch out the edit summaries of the following users from the Edit History of America's Got Talent (season 3), as you did with the last lot who vandalized the article? I figured their summaries are just as bad for the following reason on each:

• Ong Tiong San - Summary references a political party of Singapore, not relevant to the article, and includes what looks like Political Propaganda in it
• CHLOE SEAH YI XUAN & ANGEL TANG SHU TING - Used Chinese text, and the note of numbers before them like a time, makes me believe they are showing off a TV Schedule in their language
• Tony Tan Keng Yam - Edit summaries have been done to link to Singaporean people that has no relevance to the article, and makes no sense to state within edit summaries.
• Lim Li-Wei - Summaries seem to stipulate a program time for Singaporean television, and advocates a falsehood on a winner.
• The fabulous 60-minute Price is Right! - No idea what they were doing with these, but it looks like absolute gibberish.
• America's Got Talent is back! - Abosolute gibberish, or naming Singaporean people which makes no sense to talk about with a edit on the article.

Can you help out? GUtt01 (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, can I say a big thank you to you for what you did to that article! After so many years of persistent disruption to it by socks vandalizing it in the same manner, it is truly a big relief to finally find someone realizing that the problem would continue to persist unless something dynamic was done to nip it in the bud once and for all! Let's hope that this will end the matter for good, and again a well deserved, monumental thank you. I'm sure other editors who have hated this will be relieved as much as me. ^w^ GUtt01 (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@GUtt01: Yes, I took a bit of a deep dive. There has been considerable disruption and sockpuppetry for many, many years. This is just long-term abuse and there is no sign of it letting up. Enough is enough. On the scratching out, I’ve revision deleted a couple of the more obviously disruptive summaries but I’m inclined to just let the others fade away in the history. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Further reversion

Special:Contributions/LolWWENarj prob. needs a block. And the page needs protection (hopefully you're faster than RFPP). Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The 109.xx IP too needs the same treatment, I fear... And don't know if some of these edits need revdel RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Two blocks and page protection done. Didn’t see any others in need of an immediate block. I’ll have a look at the revdel issue. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

This is what caught my eye; in case you wonder (it's grossly inappropriate). 8 minutes between a report at RfPP and protection must be close to a speed record, considering how often there's a post about a backlog there at AN... Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it’s the 109 IP doing that. I think I’ve caught it all but I’ll check again. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

• @RandomCanadian: Well! I just happen to see an IPv6 vandalising a page (via edit filters) and found myself in the midst of a storm! Hopefully, things will calm down. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Recent changes is overrated; edit filters are usually much more reliable :) Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

RPP

Hi! I had filed this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Sindhu_Joy Would you be able to address it? Thanks. Vikram Vincent 09:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Vikram Vincent 09:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

hth! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

An unrelated request (also at RFPP, about a page which you protected), don't know if you got the ping, here? Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Ey up, sorry, I missed this one. When I looked at the protection log, I saw three periods of protection in ten years - two months, six months, and most recently, one month, and long periods without protection. That didn’t scream out to me that this was a page that needs to be protected indefinitely but, you know, I’m open to reviewing the protection I placed. I’ll have a look. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Sarhaan Singh

Hello There, Want to discuss about Sarhaan Singh wikipedia. Now this actor have enough reliable news to create page. please take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anish1121 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Anish1121. Who is Sarhaan Singh? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Request for the Undeletion of "Rick Peterson (Politician)"

Rick Peterson most certainly meets Wikipedia's notability standards.

He has ran for leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada twice, has ran for member of parliament multiple times. He is also president of Canada's 6th largest capital investment company by investor connections. Peterson is currently running in Edmonton-Strathcona.

Peterson was also considered as a possible replacement for Peter Mackay. He is the former head of Suits and Boots, a conservative advocacy group.

It astonished me to learn he didn't have an article, considering how well known he is. BasedMises (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Rick Peterson has been discussed twice on Wikipedia, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Peterson (Canadian politician) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Peterson (politician). The outcome of both discussion was that he did not meet inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopaedia. Two criteria were cited: the first is WP:POLITICIAN, essentially that the person must have held office at a high level; the other is the general notability guideline, which requires that the person should have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Is there new information that shows he meets these inclusion criteria? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

• When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
• Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

• A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Request for unprotection

Hello Malcolmxl5, I've been informed by an Afc reviewer that Draft:Omah Lay cannot be accepted if the main space page is not unprotected. I noted that you protected the page in August last year due to multiple recreations. I have however addressed notability concerns by adding 3, 4 and 5 such that the subject now meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO#1. He was nominated at the Ghana Music Award and won a Headie so he meets WP:MUSICBIO#8. Kindly help review for possible unprotection to help with the Afc process. Many thanks. The Sokks💕 ^_(talk) 18:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi The Sokks. It looks as though protection has been lowered to ECP so any AfC reviewer who is EC can now move the page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

This is noted with thanks. The Sokks💕 ^_(talk) 20:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Thank you, CAPTAIN RAJU, that was a very long time ago! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train

Sir, please provide protection to this page . The page has already vandilized many times by a lots of IP Users. Please provide semi-protection or pending changes for indefinite period of time. I have already request on WP:RPP. But, still I am requesting you. いちか かすが (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Looks like the page has been protected. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

The Super League

Please protect The Super League. See my WP:RPP request. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I’ve protected for one week. It’s a bit of a leap to jump to indefinite protection for an article that’s just a few hours old. Let’s see how it goes, we can extend protection if disruption resumes after it expires. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

your block of user:122.106.142.3

Has now hopped to user:49.179.139.195 (same ISP and city). Compare [6] by 122. and [7] by 49. Meters (talk) 10:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, have blocked them. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up that edit I somehow missed undoing. Meters (talk) 10:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

No problem. :) Easy to miss. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Barry Aycock for improvement

Hi- hoping we can discuss the article here? I feel like several sources were not cited in the previous published article, and I'm more than happy to make some adjustments. Please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talk • contribs) 15:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, the article was nominated for discussion by an editor; you can find the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Aycock. It was discussed for seven days and then I assessed the consensus of the discussion - all perfectly normal, this process happens hundreds of times every week.

The consensus was very clearly for deletion, that the subject does not meet inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopaedia. The general notability criteria, which requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, is cited and also the inclusion criteria for politicians.

If you are going to improve the article, you will need multiple high-quality sources that discuss the subject in depth - what are your three best sources? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks so much for your response. On the article in question, I included a variety of quality sources. Several were from from the largest news outlets within the designated region. On the biography at the front-end, In realize there was not a great deal of citations. I can remove that section for now, and include a citation to the profile when posted. I'm providing a link to the Ownership Biography section of the NBA's G-League Texas Legends. There is some additional information within this site, and I am more than willing to provide more if you'll consider reversing the deletion.

Thanks so much, take care! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Are you able to link to your three best sources? I can then give you advice on the best way forward. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure - here are three: • https://ingrams.com/article/50-missourians-you-should-know-2/ • https://showmetimes.com/Blogpost/upt9/Aycock-Considers-Missouris-Director-of-Agriculture • https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/southeast-missouri-businessman-named-to-judge-discipline-panel/article_24c0f15d-40ee-51eb-a4a4-3e958934f39f.html

I have others I'm happy to provide upon request. I look forward to your response.

-- Hi - just wondering if you were able to consider my request. Please let me know at your convenience, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talk • contribs) 21:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering if you were able to look into this any further?

Hi Zachhedrick. What the community will look for so that the page does not get deleted again are independent sources that address the subject directly and in-depth. In-depth profiles of Mr Aycock with biographical material that can be summarised into an article would be ideal. Multiple in-depth sources are preferred.

I have moved the page into what we call draftspace at Draft:Barry Aycock where you will have some time and space to edit and improve the article. If you need help or have any questions, visit the Teahouse. When you have finished editing, submit the article for review (there is a link in the template at the top of the page) and a reviewer will look it over before it is moved to article space. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Malcolmxl5 - I appreciate all of your great assistance. I will work on this directly and make my submission. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachhedrick (talk • contribs) 15:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Kqbi69

TPA also needs to go with them, judging from their 'unblock requests'. Nate • (chatter) 01:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, looks like they’ve gone away. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

지아 (1986년)

Hello Malcolmxl5, is it possible to revoke the TPA of 지아 (1986년) who you blocked? They're insulting you on their TP. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

LOL. Yes, I’ve removed TPA. Thanks. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks - a day in the life of an admin, lol. Pahunkat (talk) 08:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Italian IP LTAs

Hi. You recently blocked 79.30.115.47 for disruption. Today 79.30.102.23 restored one of the blocked IP's edits you reverted, clearly block evasion.

Both of these IPs are part of a group based in Brescia, Italy -- probably the work of a single editor -- which have become an LTA. You can see the list here and read the discussion I have had with @Acroterion: about them here.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked! Telecom Italia is a pain, it’s one of those highly dynamic ISPs across many ranges. I’ve been dealing with a LTA in the Perugia region who targets BLPs, one in particular, with very nasty comments. He’s being throttled back with an edit filter, possibly that might be a solution here? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately, if an edit filter is based on content, their content is not consistent. The couple of articles about historians where they consistently changed "Marxist historian" to "criminal" I've managed to get protected, but their other edits are not similar enough, I don't think, to craft an edit filter for. Acroterion has put up some range blocks, which has helped slow them down, but they still manage to do damage. (I say "they*, but it's pretty clearly one person.) Thanks for the block. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:40, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

CSD

Hi Malcolm, Just spotted your note at the MFD - Unfortunately different admins have different ways of deleting things and I was 90% sure that whatever criteria I picked the dealing admin was going to decline it as not being applicable. I hate 7 day discussions as the next person but you sort of begin to get fed up with choosing the "quick route" only for that admin not to make it quick at all.
You're more than welcome to delete the page and speedy close the MFD I certainly have no objections to that. Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 20:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I thought better of suggesting a CSD after reflecting on it. Still, the MfD is only a few days... --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your continuing efforts on the project! — xaosflux Talk 10:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, xaosflux. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protect a page

Hello, I could use some administrative help over at the Windows 2000 article. IP 176.88.31.134 is adding revisionist/inaccurate information to the article, despite my attempts to stop him/her. Could anything be done to stop this? Thanks, 192.69.181.186 (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

It looks like a, er, rather technical content dispute, the kind of thing that should be hashed out on the talk page. I’ll watch it for while before making a move. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I have proof from Microsoft to end the dispute but 176.88.31.134 believes otherwise, for whatever reason. If it's any help, I put together this imgur album: [8] 192.69.181.186 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

And of course the image in the infobox refers to the "Windows 2000 Server Setup". I’ve asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing for someone with a bit more knowledge than me to check out the 176.x.x.x IP edits, hopefully that will get a few more eyes on this. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

184.147.36.112

Hi Malcomxl5, I've noticed you blocked this IP address for a week, which seems quite heavy-handed for a first block, especially when pretty much all the edits the IP has made seem to be valid contests of proposed deletion tags, and also undoing the incorrect restoration of prod tags by another user. I understand how removal of a large block of PROD tags can be seen as disruptive, but in my opinion I don't think this warrants a week-long block if it even warrants a block at all. Is there something else at play that I've missed here? stwalkerster (talk) 17:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi stwalkerster. I took the view that they were being deliberately disruptive in de-prodding ten articles in two minutes today (and yesterday, four in two minutes). But I’m grateful for your view on this and I’m happy to unblock if you feel it is heavy-handed. I’ll do that momentarily. Regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you muchly! :) stwalkerster (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
• The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

• The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for fixing Discrimination! Stickymatch 01:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thank you for your assistance with defamatory content. Cheers! 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Jinnifer

Hi-

You blocked a Jinnifer IP sock yesterday (107.77.241.3); today they're using 107.77.241.52. Could you shut them down, please? Given the IPs, I don't know if a rangeblock would be possible, or would cause too much collateral damage. Thanks. Grandpallama (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. And I’ve blocked 107.77.241.0/24 for six months; the range has been blocked several times before. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated. They're a minor-level nuisance, but a persistent one! Grandpallama (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Well

...that was not funny. I ran CU and placed a few more blocks. Hate these misogynists. Drmies (talk) 00:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Good work, Drmies. 👍 --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

No, thank you: it was your helpful edit summaries that got my attention. Drmies (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hi, how would one go about reporting an ivp6 ip range to aiv? Thanks - wolf 16:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

I’ve seen people use:

* {{IPvandal | 2402:8100:2245:a103::/64}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~

That works, I guess. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll give it a try. - wolf 17:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

And here it is. - wolf 17:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

I see it. Is this the guy: Special:Contributions/2001:fb1:12::/48? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I see ToBeFree has gone with a 2001:fb1:10::/46 rangeblock, which I guess will take care of that! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Sure looks like it. Hope that does the job. Thanks again - wolf 17:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Richard Corcoran page

Thank you for reverting the deletions. It's a controversial moment (he's up for a university presidency) and there may be more of the same--any chance you can make the page semi-protected? 71.209.71.229 (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I have it on my watchlist and will protect it if I see significant disruption. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you 71.209.71.229 (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

More vandalism just now--also noted here: User_talk:Kirill_Lokshin#Richard_Corcoran_page 71.209.71.229 (talk) 02:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

OK, the page has been protected by Izno for a few days and I’ve given the miscreant a week off. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED!

This IP User:5.43.73.49 is vandalizing continuously, and he/she/they has deleted many, many warnings from his/her/their talk page. I have reported the user at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and the user is continuously vandalizing it is very urgent! Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 14:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

I was just looking at that! Blocked for 72 hours. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

And I’ve upped it to six months for block evasion; see also user:5.43.83.177, user:5.43.68.125. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

LTA

Lex Hoshter 7365O8464TN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a sock of Evlekis, please revoke TPA and email as socks tend to abusively ping vandal fighters after blocking. JavaHurricane 08:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

They are back Lex Hoshter 7365O4864TN. Ashleyyoursmile! 08:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

My first vandal-made attack page, I feel like this is a (pretty pointless) accomplishment. Elli (talk | contribs) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Malcolmxl5 and Elli. --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

@Ashleyyoursmile: wasn't expecting to see your name at http://listen.hatnote.com lol, oh well. Elli (talk | contribs) 08:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

And another: Lex Hoshter 73658O464TN. A word of warning, be careful in blocking accounts with similar usernames but no "vandal" edits (this one clearly is a sock) - it could be an impersonation trick. Pahunkat (talk) 08:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that link Elli, it's quite mesmerising. Cabayi (talk) 08:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks all for dealing with the latest vandal attack from Evlekis! JavaHurricane 08:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

• Are we all done for now? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

  I hope so. The only thing left to be done is the locking, but as Evlekis doesn't seem to do much xwiki abuse nowadays (unlike some LTAs I have to deal with daily), that doesn't seem very urgent at any rate. Thanks once again! JavaHurricane 08:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

The first Lex had a global user page. I'd suggest checking meta if they appear again. Hey Ashleyyoursmile, with this much abuse it's like your RFA passed already Cabayi (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk page access of User:BobTheBuilder696966s Army Rises

Hello; please consider revoking talk page access from User:BobTheBuilder696966s Army Rises due to talk page abuse here. Thank you! Tol | Talk | Contribs 01:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Darnell Mooney

Could you bump up the protection level at Darnell Mooney. The vandalism on his Wikipedia page is ongoing, and was reported in the media, see [9]. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

It’s one edit, handled by a revert and a warning. I’ve put the page on my watchlist and will keep an eye on it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

IP removing runner-up honors

Hi, you have blocked the IP 14.228.161.154 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) on 30 April for persistently making disruptive edits, i.e. removing runner-up honors. I'm seeing similar behavior now from other IPs from the the same provider, 123.17.24.73 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 14.244.251.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). 113.186.154.19 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was already blocked for this behavior some time ago. I'm afraid that there is the same editor behind al those IPs and the after the next block they will just continue with a new IP. Is there something that can be done to prevent this? --Jaellee (talk) 19:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, that looks a tricky one. A rangeblock is not possible for these IPs and there are probably too many articles involved to protect them all. I’ll look into it. Do ping me if you see them again. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Noting another one, 14.235.129.251 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking them. But it seems that this editor is just continuing. I'm really getting tired of this. --Jaellee (talk) 21:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@Jaellee: Yes, it’s very frustrating. I’ve been putting together a list of IPs and articles affected at user:Malcolmxl5/sandbox#Vietnam. Have you seen any other IPs doing this? Ping me or drop me a line if you see a new one. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

At the moment, all the IP's with that behavior are contained in your list (at least the ones I know). If I spot another one, I'll inform you. --Jaellee (talk) 20:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Brescia LTA 1

See the edits of 87.5.93.42 at German Social Reform Party. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I’ve also semi-protected a couple of pages for a week. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another one, Beyond My Ken: 5.170.4.165 --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another: 79.54.93.202. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• And 79.50.117.194. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
• Since Zzuuzz blocked a couple of others today, I also brought these two to their attention. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hmm. This LTA is hard to pin down. I was looking at 5.170.0.0/19 and 95.232.96.0/19 as possible rangeblocks but there’s collateral damage, I think, and of course they use so many other disparate IPs. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

P.S. Are 5.170.24.87, 95.232.97.153 and 95.232.103.131 on your list, Beyond My Ken? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Nope, I'll add them now. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

The first (5.170...), the edit to the TV series article is a little out of character. Trotskyism is new, but right up their alley.

The second is definite, Wolves of Vinland is one of their articles.

The third, Sea Watch is one of their articles, but the other two articles (an actor/director/talk show host and a video game) are new and, again, somewhat out of character.

I don't know what to think about that. Big brother/kid brother? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Given how dynamic these IPs appear to be, the earlier edits could be someone else entirely, certainly the 2009 and 2013 edits and probably the February 2021 one too. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, that's probably it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another one Beyond My Ken: 5.170.5.87 at Edward Dutton (author). Fits nicely into that /19 range I mentioned above. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks. What's interesting to me is that we had a period of relative quiet, and then this burst of activity. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)