This morning I decided to put my first article on wikipedia.
I am so impressed with the automatic things here in this community - wow!
A series of logical ideas control everything. Autobots go around like programs in the Matrix film, actually getting things sorted step by step, that is very impressive. These rules are minimal, powerful, and keep the whole thing secure with the crazy idea, anyone can contribute. This is ay may zing.
Sure, it is inconvenient that a suitable article on my pet subject, Human Design, cannot be easily introduced. I had to make certain changes, firstly DELETING ALL THE CONTENT, all that remained was HD is a "set of ideas" and "lots of people are interested".
My reasoning for inclusion is that 1 million people maybe 2 are interested, we cannot be sure of the exact number or honesty of those claiming that, but the proliferation of websites and human design "professionals" and "consultants" and social networking, and so on, THIS is NOTABLE.
BUt wikipedia needs reliable secondary sources, and the fact is the originator is reclusive and rich and has top lawyers on to anyone who dares publish secondary sources.
So i heard.
Let me know if you feel moved to comment. Thank you
Ciao for now
Mahalo
Mikemahalo (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Mikemahalo (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)