Tipping-Point Margins (TPM) Model

edit

In United States presidential elections, it can be difficult to properly reflect how decisively the winning candidate actually won. The national popular vote is the most immediately obvious choice, and, in most cases, it is fairly useful. However, a candidate does not need to win the national popular vote to win the election, and this has happened five times in American history. Alternatively, since it is the electoral college that actually decides the election, converting the candidates' electoral votes into percentages of the total number of electoral votes to obtain a winning margin might be better. Nevertheless, though this will always align with the election winner, the fact that most states have used winner-takes-all systems to allocate their electoral votes means that this method will almost always inflate how well a candidate actually did (for example, the EV-percent method would say that Donald Trump won the 2016 election by around 13 points, even though he won Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the states that gave him the presidency, by less than a point each).

Given that neither of these methods truly accurately shows the margin by which a candidate won an election, the table below substitutes in the results from the "tipping-point" states, which are the the states with the smallest margins of victory for the winning candidates that such candidates could not lose without winning the election. As an example, in 2012, if you organized the states won by Obama from the smallest to the largest percent margins of victory for him and then started shifting states to Romney from the smallest margin of victory, Obama would still win until you would get to Colorado; this thus makes Colorado the tipping-point state for the 2012 election, and, given Colorado's results that year, we could thus say that Obama won the election by just over five points. In this way, this system remains tied to the electoral college (thus always aligning with the actual election winner) while also not overstating how well that winner did like simple EV percent shares suggest.

However, given that this deals with the actual percentage results for the tipping-point states, rather than just seeing what particular states they happen to be for each election, there are a few parameters to clarify what is shown below:

  • Multi-way presidential elections in which more than two candidates won electoral votes or elections that could have theoretically resulted in an electoral college tie have usually had two or more tipping-point states: one for the candidate who actually one and others for each of the runners-up. For these elections, the states whose results are shown below were chosen based on speculation as to who would have won in contingent elections. Given that the actual composition of the US House with such shifted results cannot be known, the margins shown for these elections cannot be considered as reliable or useful.
  • Tipping-point states are also determined based on the pledged electoral vote resulting from the election. Thus, tipping-point states that account for electors that abstained, cast faithless votes, or died beforehand are not used.
  • In many cases throughout American history, presidential candidates (especially minor ones) were on the ballot in some states but not others. As such, in order to make the results shown more nationally representative, the percentages of the major candidates are adjusted by multiplying them by the difference between 100% and the total national percentage of the candidates who were not on the ballot in the tipping-point states.
  • Lastly, two election in American history, 1800 and 1824, were decided by contingent elections in the US House due to no candidate getting a majority of electoral votes in either election. In these contingent elections, unlike than the electoral college, each state received one vote, with their votes being decided by their delegation of representatives. Ultimately, given the relatively few amount of "voters" in these elections, most state's results within their delegations were quite lopsided, meaning that using tipping-point results would likely serve to obscure, rather than clarify, the actual decisiveness of the winning candidates' victories. As such, the original percent shares of state delegations won by each candidate are shown, though what the tipping-point results would have been have still been provided in parentheses.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Only includes major candidates.
  2. ^ Adams was elected as a Democratic-Republican. He became a National Republican after the Democratic-Republican Party split between his "Adams-Clay" faction and Andrew Jackson's faction.
  3. ^ Tyler took office after his predecessor (William Henry Harrison) died.
  4. ^ Tyler took office as a Whig, but was soon expelled from the party for repeatedly vetoing their bills.
  5. ^ Fillmore took office after his predecessor (Zachary Taylor) died.
  6. ^ Johnson took office after his predecessor (Abraham Lincoln) was assassinated.
  7. ^ Johnson took office as a Republican (National Union). He returned to the Democratic Party before the 1868 election.
  8. ^ Arthur took office after his predecessor (James A. Garfield) died from an assassination attempt.
  9. ^ a b Roosevelt took office after his predecessor (William McKinley) died from an assassination attempt.
  10. ^ Wilson hoped in private that he would be nominated again and influenced the primary field in an effort to persuade the delegates to do so, but he never formally ran for a third term.
  11. ^ a b Coolidge took office after his predecessor (Warren G. Harding) died from a heart attack.
  12. ^ a b Truman took office after his predecessor (Franklin D. Roosevelt) died.
  13. ^ a b Johnson took office after his predecessor (John F. Kennedy) was assassinated.
  14. ^ Ford took office after his predecessor (Richard Nixon) resigned.