Here are the articles that were created or expanded by students in Semester 1 of the 2012–2013 academic year. (The articles are in the process of being edited and made publicly available on Wikipedia.)
| ← 2011–2012 | 2013–2014 → |
| Group | Section G2 | Section G3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Separation of powers in Singapore | By-elections in Singapore |
| 2 | Judicial system of Singapore Update this article with a section on the meaning of judicial power. |
Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law |
| 3 | Legitimate expectation Prepare an article that discusses legitimate expectation generally (not specifically with reference to Singapore law). The article should be based primarily on English law, but you should mention Singapore cases where relevant. See "Natural justice" for an article along similar lines that was worked on by your seniors. |
Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law Prepare an article on this topic independently, without referring either to "Administrative law in Singapore" or "Doctrine of bias in Singapore law" (all articles will be put through a plagiarism check!). |
| 4 | Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law The section on the law relating to amenability. |
R. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan Please expand this article about R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213, C.A. (England & Wales). As far as possible, ensure that you refer to secondary materials (books, case notes and journal articles), not just the case itself. |
| 5 | Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law The section on the law relating to justiciability. |
Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni Please write an article about Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni [2007] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 85, H.C. (Singapore). As far as possible, ensure that you refer to secondary materials (books, case notes and journal articles), not just the case itself. |
| 6 | Sedition Act (Singapore) Expand the article, in particular discussing the relationship between the Act and the right to freedom of speech and expression in Article 14(1)(a) of the Constitution. |
Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Minister for Information and the Arts Please write an article about the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments in Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Minister for Information and the Arts [1995] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 627 and [1996] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 294. As far as possible, ensure that you refer to secondary materials (books, case notes and journal articles), not just the cases themselves. |
| 7 | Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs Update the article with a section on the Court of Appeal's judgment in Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs [1990] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 347. |
Threshold issues in Singapore constitutional law Please write a section on the law relating to standing (locus standi). You must discuss standing as it applies to declarations, but may omit standing as it applies to mandatory orders, prohibiting orders and quashing orders if you wish. |
| 8 | Ouster clause | Threshold issues in Singapore constitutional law Please write a section on the law relating to justiciability. You must write the article independently and not refer to any of the content of the article to be prepared by Group 4 of Section G2. |
Accolades
edit | On 9 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ouster clause, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in the UK a total ouster clause in a statute generally does not prevent a person from applying for judicial review of a public authority's decision, but a partial ouster clause does? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ouster clause. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — Gatoclass 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
| | On 24 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that justiciability is a threshold issue in Singapore administrative law, and the Court of Appeal has held that exercises of prosecutorial discretion and the clemency power are justiciable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — The DYK project (nominate) 00:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC) |
| | On 7 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Separation of powers in Singapore, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Singapore Government takes the view that separation of powers is less important than choosing leaders that can be trusted and do not need to be fettered? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Separation of powers in Singapore. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. — The DYK project (nominate) 20:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
| | On 20 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a 1991 Singapore court case quashed an order requiring a woman to rename her business for being too similar to J. C. Penney as the authorities had taken into account irrelevant considerations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it may be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Thank you — Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC) |
| | On 25 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sedition Act (Singapore), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1966 two Members of the Singapore Parliament were convicted of sedition for claiming that the People's Action Party government was "plotting to murder" an opposition politician? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sedition Act (Singapore). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC) |
| | On 8 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Legitimate expectation, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a 1999 UK case held that a disabled woman told by a health authority she would have a "home for life" in a facility had a substantive legitimate expectation the authority would not shut it down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Legitimate expectation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC) |
| | On 8 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article R. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a 1999 UK case held that a disabled woman told by a health authority she would have a "home for life" in a facility had a substantive legitimate expectation the authority would not shut it down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Legitimate expectation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC) |
| | On 6 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article By-elections in Singapore, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in a 2013 case, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that the Prime Minister was wrong to say he had discretion under the Constitution not to call a by-election to fill a parliamentary vacancy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/By-elections in Singapore. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC) |
Participants
editGroup 1
|
Group 5
|
| Group 2 | Group 6 |
| Group 3 | Group 7 |
| Group 4 | Group 8 |
| Group 1 | Group 5 |
| Group 2 | Group 6
|
Group 3
|
Group 7 |
| Group 4 | Group 8
|