Welcome!

edit

Hi КириллТелегин990! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Largoplazo (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article talk pages

edit

Hello. Article talk pages are only for discussing the state of their articles and improvements to them, not for general questions about their topic (especially when the article already contains the answer!) See Help:Talk pages for more information. Largoplazo (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zona Quente (2017 film)

edit
 

The article Zona Quente (2017 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of any notability, please provide reliable independent sources about the film if any exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Syria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. See above where I explained to you about a week ago what article talk pages are for. Your continued improper use of these pages amounts to disruptive editing. Largoplazo (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Sindhudesh movement, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥  01:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Rafic Hariri. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 14:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Timmy Time, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

In Special:Diff/1243486157, you again added a link to a country name. Please STOP doing that, per MOS:OVERLINK, as I advised you earlier.
Also, you have been removing a lot of red links from articles. Please read WP:REDLINK for guidance on when to do that. You should NOT indiscriminately remove all red links you encounter. Instead red links should be removed only if there is no chance that the target of the link will ever be a Wikipedia article. It does not appear to me that you are following that guidance. CodeTalker (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply