|
——————————————— Archive, March 2012 ———————————————
You may want to take a look at the ongoing discussion about it. Afghanistan does have a copyright law it turns out. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 01:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently you missed the line right above the "Copy Right" note:
- "Following conditions will apply when Afghanistan becomes a signatory of international copyright agreements" Buffs (talk) 02:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I added that line actually. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 02:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
What happened about these? Are we still stuck at hitting the transclusion limit? If yes, could I give fixing it a shot? If this too is yes, could you explain what is done by which subtemplate  ?
PS:If you remember, some time ago I'd tried to make a script for creating the country-wise templates. I've succeeded :D
Its at User:Siddhartha Ghai/MTC.js. Right now, its only for creation, not editing already existing templates; it doesn't support demembership or different kinds of membership or "countrylink". But it works (and it shouldn't be hard to add support for the rest of this stuff). Oh, and since its "Experimental" as of now, it only edits my sandbox. That can easily be changed to edit the subtemplates instead if you think its good enough to use. Regards--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 19:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I haven't given up on the idea. I probably need to find a way to make the templates simpler. It is unlikely that devs will increase the transclusion count.
- I'd be happy to resume working on them now that I am not alone :)
- -- A Certain White Cat chi? 20:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Two questions remaining:
- What are the intended input parameters to be supported when the templates are actually used?
- How do we want the templates to be used? Was it supposed to be something like
{{Membership|United States|Mexico|Antarctica|Sealand}} to produce the table with these countries? And how is it supposed to remove certain organisations from the table while retaining others (meaning remove some columns and show others)
- Asking these since I believe the current subtemplates are too bulky and can be significantly cut down upon. However, since I don't know what you had in mind when creating these and what the params in the already-created 100+ country-wise templates are for, I can't really think of how to make these leaner.--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hello とある白い猫, need to inform you that when you rename the media files, be sure to tag the previous non required files for deletion as they are unnecessary. For example, files like this [1] need to be tagged for deletion and general maintenance And also, those files which are on use on a Wikipedia articles and other namespace needs to the corrected accordingly. Just moving files does not make the work done fully. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I normally do not move images with questionable copyright status or are undergoing a deletion review. For the specific example I do not see the problem. I was going to update every entry for the images actually. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 20:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, although you moved your page to Template:Ranks and insignia of NATO/Generic, it does not look as if it is working. I see this:
!{{{Grade}}}
|-
So I suggest that you move it back to the sandbox name and fix it first, otherwise it will be deleted again. At least put a no include comment to say what it is and how it is used. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I cannot develop parser functions in my userspace. I am TYPING the code now. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 12:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have completed one grade: Template:Ranks and insignia of NATO/Generic/Army/OF-10 feel free to take a look. I have also added notes to other templates per your request. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 13:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- So I hope you like the updated template :) -- A Certain White Cat chi? 16:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Looking better. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I hope it is getting even better. :) I cannot thank you enough for making this possible as there was little possibility if I did not have the original code. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- One suggestion for the (Edit) link is to reduce this to [e] and make it small, as 99.99% of people who read will not actually want to edit it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I have made that very modification yesterday per your request. It indeed looks far better. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 09:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
What is the advantage of putting countries at top versus ranks? Either way they go off the page, but with countries it seems to be even worse. Or is this just a secondary change, more important being the compartmentalisation, breaking it into changeable chunks? Theoretically it seems the same template could be used to go in either directions with some well-placed styling and parsers, anyhow, though it could get a little messy on the code end. Did you have any plans for this? Just don't tell me it's already implemented or I might die from the amazement or something.
Completely unrelatedly, I have to ask - what's with the 12s in your signature? — Isarra (talk) 08:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- The first challenge of phasing out currently used system is standardizing the data. Top-down presentation of ranks is more natural to express hierarchical structure. The linked template is the master page for army ranks where one can see all of them in bulk allowing easier review to find problems. Also for use in articles sideways representation can be too expensive. I have attempted to demonstrate the modular possibility of the proposed template system. Mind you a lot of work is pending the completetiion of the master table and move/svgification of existing insignia which would simplify code allowing even more options.
- The /12 is the year. :)
- -- A Certain White Cat chi? 09:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Or you could talk about a single rank group like here. It is modular. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Aiight, yeah, that's sensible. The modularity apparently indeed does allow for considerable flexibility, so very nice on that account. What about pages where the lot are used, however? Is there any way to make that work, or is just using everything on one page kind of silly anyway? Seems silly, anyway. And what do you mean by sideways being expensive? — Isarra (talk) 19:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Sideways ends up taking too much space (width) even if you only display a single country. I intend to implement a h-bar to deal with the overflowing issue at some point. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, good plan. You do this a lot, then? — Isarra (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I work with templates a lot, yes. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 23:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/タチコマ robot (12) as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.Reply
I'm terribly boring, sorry. In other news, I filled in the rest on the main pile. — Isarra (talk) 01:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
|
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:IMG_3970.JPG&action=edit){kind=link}
