02ramya95

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, 02ramya95, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Yumna Zaidi

Hi 02ramya95! Thank you for your suggestions to improve our article about Yumna Zaidi. I see that you want to update her birthdate. We already have two reliable sources cited in the article for her birthdate being 30 July 1989: Daily Pakistan says that she celebrated her 32nd birthday on 30 July 2021 (the article says "today (June 30)" but it was published on 30 July), and Bol News says that she turned 31 on 30 July 2020. These both support a birth date of 30 July 1989, like it says in our article. If you think this is not correct and should be changed, you need to make an edit request on the article's talk page (Talk:Yumna Zaidi), and provide a link to the source where you're getting the information so that it can be verified. The source needs to meet our reliable source standards, which generally means we cannot accept social media posts, or websites like IMDb or Wikia which let any user change the information. Please don't change edit requests from other users, and don't add to requests that have already been answered. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

And if you're wondering why we insist on a strong, independent-of-her source on this, the film and TV industries tend to engage in ageism, giving her every incentive to lie about her DOB. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 16:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Mandatory paid editing disclosure

Hello 02ramya95. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:02ramya95. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=02ramya95|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for choosing to ignore this notice and continuing to edit anyway in spite of being warned not to.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Anachronist (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

02ramya95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not repeat my mistake if anything is there I will respond to ur message please unblock me this time 02ramya95 (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Specifically, you need to explain this comment in which you refer to "we" as if this account is a representative of Yumna Zaidi. It is clear you have a conflict of interest, and it is mandatory for that to be disclosed. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Yumna zaidi age is incorrect

Yumna zaidi age is 30 July 1992 not 30 July 1989 yumna zaidi did her first tv show muhabbat ab nai hogi in the year 2005/2006 as affan Waheed sister charcter when she was in 8th grade at that time her age was 13/14 years at present she is 31 not 34 years

Her self claimed that her date of birth, father name, birth place and some details are incorrect 02ramya95 (talk) 12:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

I removed the birth date wholesale from the article on her last week, around the time you got indefinitely blocked. We have no control over Google's Knowledge Panel or mirrors of Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 14:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm Sorry for disturbing yes I have been got blocked I don't idea convey

I'm really very sorry but in Google still that incorrect date of birth displays 02ramya95 (talk) 19:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Then contact Google. If Google is displaying something in error, that is not something we can control.

You can be unblocked if you write a new unblock appeal that clearly explains (a) your understanding of why you were blocked, (b) your relationship with Yumna Zaidi, and (c) how you intend to proceed if you are unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Bear in mind Google does not cull information just from Wikipedia. It'll also pull information from Wikipedia mirrors (which likely have an old revision with the birthdate), from IMDb (which doesn't fact-chcek), and from various other celebrity "biography" sites. When I say we have no control over the Knowledge Panel, understand that I am not being hyperbolic and that this issue has come up myriad times before, with the same circumstances. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 03:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Yumna zaidi first drama

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDd8bhpAgVs/?hl=en 02ramya95 (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The more you post this sort of stuff instead of convincing unblock requests, the more likely it is administrators will revoke talk page access. You have also been told repeatedly that we cannot cite social media. Please stop bringing out this link as if it proves anything, as we cannot use it as a source here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 18:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

I agree. While you are blocked, use your talk page ONLY to appeal or discuss your block. Don't write about anything else. If you do, I will revoke your access to your talk page. Consider this a final warning. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Appeal for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

02ramya95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

(a) I understand that i was that editing without blocking administrator consent, (b) I don't have any relationship with Yumna Zaidi but I'm a fan of hers , and (c) I will not edit without ur consent but need help u sir/maam. 02ramya95 (talk) 12:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You were blocked for undisclosed paid editing. I accept your insistence that you are not editing in behalf of Yumna Zaidi. Your constant requests to change the birth date without supplying any reliable independent sources is disruptive, however. Therefore, I have released your block on the rest of Wikipedia, but you remain blocked from editing Yumna Zaidi or Talk:Yumna Zaidi. You may edit constructively elsewhere. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

If the help involves anything to do with Zaidi's birthdate, then there is nothing we can realistically do without a reliable source with no connexion to her. The birthdate has been removed and won't be restored without a source of that calibre; any instances of it on other websites are beyond our capability to deal with. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 15:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your self-reference to "we" in this edit implies that you represent Yumna Zaidi. Please explain that. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

(a) I understand that i was that editing without blocking administrator consent, (b) I don't have any relationship with Yumna Zaidi but I'm a fan of hers , and (c) I will not edit without ur consent but need ur help sir/maam. 02ramya95 (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Im sir/ma'am I'm fed up of requesting for unblock appealing requesting for changes in the incorrect date of birth this is the link below that yumna zaidi first tv drama when she was in class 8th grade in the 2005/2006 at that time she was 13/14 years age https://www.instagram.com/p/CDd8bhpAgVs/?hl=en

This is last time I'm really very sorry 😞 I'm not representing yumna zaidi i'll never request or request for edit again and thank you for blocking me @Anachronist 02ramya95 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

I have released your block on the rest of Wikipedia, but you remain blocked from editing about Yumna Zaidi. See your block message above for explanation. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

@Anachronist

Thank you so much sir/ma'am but why I'm blocked in yumna zaidi page or talk page:yumna zaidi due to constant reason for asking for change of date of birth which is incorrect 02ramya95 (talk) 04:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Because you refuse to listen to us when we tell you that the date of birth has been removed wholesale on our end, and we have no control on other websites using it. We have no control over other websites, Google included, and cannot force them to use any date, let alone whatever the correct one is. (again, the only cites you bring up are to her social media, which we cannot use as she has a very good reason to want it to be a specific age.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 06:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

thank you @Jéské Couriano 02ramya95 (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you ur time @Jéské Couriano 02ramya95 (talk) 08:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jéské Couriano I have doubt why don't you'll have any access to edit a page or add some details of page Google and other sites information is extracted from Wikipedia. I know that you'll don't have control over Google/other sites I can understand

You told that she has a good reason be it to be specific age

I'm sorry sir/ma'am I can't request u any for change anymore i was trusting Wikipedia but now I don't have trust anymore in Wikipedia

Thank you 02ramya95 (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Again, Google does not get its information exclusively from Wikipedia. It'll pull information from a lot of disparate and unrelated websites, of which Wikipedia is only one of them. This is a known issue with Google itself, and we constantly get requests to remove information that isn't in/has already been removed from our articles because the Knowledge Panel is either out of date or is culling information from non-Wikipedia sources that happen to be incorrect. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 15:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

You can trust Wikipedia because the age has been removed from the article. This has been done because there are no reliable sources to confirm it. What you find outside of Wikipedia isn't our concern. We don't like to have unverifiable information in articles, especially biographies of living people. Anything that cannot be cited to a reliable source should be removed. I have unblocked you so that you can contribute elsewhere on Wikipedia, but you are banned from the topic of Yumna Zaidi. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

why I'm I Got banned from topic of yumna zaidi page due to asking constantly asking for change the date of birth this was my mistake right to convey so you'll I didn't do any nonsense things in the page then also I have got banned anyway thank you so much 02ramya95 (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome. You have received multiple explanations already. Repeated disruption on the article talk page, combined with failure to comprehend what other people have told you about reliable sourcing, is what got you banned. You are welcome to contribute in other areas. Now WP:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. If you want to appeal your ban, you can make another unblock request. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

@Anachronist where can I appeal plz help me out 02ramya95 (talk) 06:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

You appeal the same way you did before, on this talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

thank you sir/Ma'am 02ramya95 (talk) 07:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Appeal for unblock ban for yumna zaidi page

Appeal for unblock ban for yumna zaidi page. I was constantly messaging to change the date of birth and thank you for removing the incorrect date of birth I got some details about her first drama thakan was not her first drama "mohabbat ab nahi ho gee" yumna zaidi and affan waheed first drama directed by amin Iqbal for atv in 2005/2006 when she was in 8th grade at age 13/14 years

the link below is yumna zaidi first drama

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDd8bhpAgVs/?hl=en

affanwaheed first drama serial.

https://youtube.com/shorts/_f7pD0QzMAs?si=4FgtKpUWVxbiv6TO

This is resource of her first drama

If you don't consider the information that's ok but please unblock ban i apologize to you for that thank you 02ramya95 (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

My patience is running out with this. We cannot use these sources. You've been told many times already. No Instagram. No YouTube. No interviews with Yumna Zaidi. Period. Stop posting them.

A reliable source is one that is published, like a newspaper or a magazine or a book, not a celebrity gossip blog, and not social media. It has to say clearly what her exact date of birth is, as in "Yumna Zaidi was born on <date>". It does not have to be in English, as long as it can be translated. You can also read the Arabic version of the reliable sources guideline if that is easier to understand.

If you have a source that meets all of these conditions, please post it and we will review it. If you don't, then stop asking to update it, because we won't. I see that you have added these dates to several other Wikipedias, including the Arabic and Urdu articles on Ms. Zaidi, and did not provide sources which would be suitable on English Wikipedia. I have to say you should stay blocked from editing the article here. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

@Ivanvector @Anachronist ok ma'am/sir thank you so much i will remain blocked by editing from the article any i don't want appeal for unblock the ban for this article Instagram, youtube and twitter useless right then where I have search for the information from news portals right which have same information better i will remain blocked then then providing proofs for the article thank you sir/ma'am 02ramya95 (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

You are clearly not listening to what others are repeatedly telling you. Also, you are not blocked from editing anything else on Wikipedia. You are blocked from just one out of millions of articles. If you want to appeal that one thing, do it properly, with an appeal template as instructed in the orange block message on this page above. But don't bother until you have thoroughly read and understoon Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks or your appeal will go nowhere. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Appeal for unblock page of yumna zaidi

@Anachronist i have faith you sir/ma'am due to editing talk page of yumna zaidi and repeatedly taking topic of yumna zaidi date of birth so I have been blocked 02ramya95 (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

You've barely edited anything since your block. Try editing other pages and demonstrating that you can be a productive editor first; any appeal is going to go nowhere otherwise. (It also makes your denials with regards to a possible connexion to Zaidi seem like outright lies.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 15:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Do not appeal to me. Make a proper appeal according to the instructions you have been given, and another administrator will review it, and consult with me if necessary regarding unblocking.

Furthermore, YOU ARE BANNED FROM THIS TOPIC. Continuing to harp about Yumna Zaidi on other editors' talk pages will result in a restoration of your full block. Do not discuss this topic further, neither here on your talk page nor anywhere else. You may use your talk page to discuss other articles, and also to appeal the block, but you must make a proper appeal as you did before.

I gave you access to millions of Wikipedia articles. Prove that you can be a constructive contributor, and only then can the community assess whether to lift your topic ban. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC)