December 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, December 2015 North American storm complex, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of Possible F5/EF5 Discussions

edit

Hello. This is just a little heads up that there is a large, ongoing discussion to clean-up the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes section on possible F5/EF5 tornadoes. You previously had an interest tornado related articles, so I wanted to alert you to the discussions. You can participate or watch here. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

104.246.113.199 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The SPI did not do a good job proving this innocent IP is a sock. Just added a new one with a matching WHOIS. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Over 3 million people live on Long Island, so common WHOIS is to be expected. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The audacity of that last sentence is enough to deny this one. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

104.246.113.199 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I'm sick and tired of your continued trolling. I'm going to start extending these blocks whenever I see you deliberately wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.