124.168.91.91

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vietnamese migrant brides in Taiwan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vietnamese migrant brides in Taiwan was changed by 124.168.91.91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903881 on 2020-12-05T06:57:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Culture of Vietnam and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — MarkH₂₁^talk 11:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bamboo network—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

None of my edits were disruptive. They were all constructive. You deleting my edits is very disruptive. Bamboo Network warrants deletion since all it does is induce provocation and backlash amongst ASEAN nations. It's very undiplomatic. 124.168.91.91 (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bamboo network. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

That is not vandalism. That is putting the article up for deletion as it does not meet Wikipedia's requirements of NPOV. If you want to contest against the deletion you are free to do so. If you continue to revert my edits I will have to report you for vandalism instead. 124.168.91.91 (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bamboo network, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 16:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Stop. WP:NPOV is not a valid reason for speedy deletion on this Wiki. We fix this by editing the article, not by deleting it. Materialscientist (talk) 16:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I listed G10 and G11 as perfectly valid reasons that warrants deletion. As a Vietnamese person (NOT CHINESE), the article is a state of the art piece of psy-ops warfare and I will not have peace of mind until it is deleted. It's physically and mentally ruining my life. The article is beyond repair. 124.168.91.91 (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I have also reported Materialscientist for multiple counts of vandalism for reverting my edits 124.168.91.91 (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bamboo network. The article you recently tagged for speedy deletion did not meet G10 or G11 - it is not an "attack page" or "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Editors are free to remove CSD templates if they believe that the criteria specified is not met and you cannot re-add the CSD template once it has been removed. Pahunkat (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

N.B. An admin refused your request, Materialscientist is not a vandal Pahunkat (talk) 16:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Also, try engaging in a discussion on the talk page. You've violated WP:3RR. Pahunkat (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

If I violated 3RR then so did Materialscientist 124.168.91.91 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Per WP:CSD, "If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is not uncontroversial and another deletion process should be used". In this case, it means that CSD cannot be used any more. Pahunkat (talk)

If I still want to request deletion of this article, then can you direct me to the means to request to do so? Thank you. 124.168.91.91 (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

They should not be deleting the tag then. Deletion of the tag is vandalism from my point of view. They should contest the deletion, not swipe away the tag, unless you can provide a reasonable explanation for them deleting my edits and committing 3RR.124.168.91.91 (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Any editor, provided they are not the creator of the page, is allowed to remove a CSD template. Pahunkat (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I would strongly discourage nominating the article for deletion, since a violation of WP:NPOV is not a basis for deletion alone and it's likely it will be WP:SNOW closed as keep. If you really want to, see WP:AFD Pahunkat (talk) 17:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

---