October 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of natural disasters in New Zealand— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to List of natural disasters in New Zealand. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please have a look at the following guide:

If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Y000mtah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lunella smaragda have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Y000mtah (talk) 01:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Everedux. An edit you recently made to Yogurt seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nobel Prize. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johndavies837 (talk) 22:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ned Kelly, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ned Kelly was changed by 125.236.253.153 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885054 on 2019-10-15T01:17:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly. Red Phoenix talk 01:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ned Kelly— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Everedux (talk) 01:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 01:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Everedux (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly. Everedux (talk) 01:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 01:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at George Grey. Flori4nKT A L K 22:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Maori vs maori

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Maori vs maori, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply