March 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ted Kennedy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 16:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Benjamin A. Smith II, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 16:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 16:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Taylor Swift, you may be blocked from editing. Ippantekina (talk) 02:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why do you prefer the eyesore that is the redundancy of putting Taylor's Version after every new incarnation of her past works when it's only needed once? Help me to understand why your way is better when it's redundant over my edit which is clean and orderly? 130.156.22.252 (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you recently removed content from Karl Pearson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Wasell(T) 05:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karl Pearson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karl Pearson, you may be blocked from editing. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.