October 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nepotism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. لennavecia 04:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 16 November

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Kerfstedt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. I could not find any mention of her keeping cats in her attic 2602:306:3357:BA0:D0E7:D021:346E:2D9A (talk) 05:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jenishc.
This account has been using alternate accounts to disrupt wikipedia, by deleting sources and sourced content from multiple articles. Please open an account, and avoid disruption / vandalism. Your cooperation is requested,
Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2+2 photocycloaddition have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of people who disappeared mysteriously— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bhuvneshwar Kumar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 17:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paschen's law have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KNHaw (talk) 18:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm WikiAviator. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Independence (probability theory)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. WikiAviator (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Park Won-soon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Park Won-soon. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply