Welcome!

edit

Hello 145.131.209.52!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (145.131.209.52) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 11:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

  This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Monk— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - TheMagnificentist 10:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Monk. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Monk was changed by 145.131.209.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96567 on 2017-05-19T10:14:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Monk, you may be blocked from editing. - TheMagnificentist 10:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Giethoorn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

edit
 
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to French Indochina in World War II has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at French Indochina in World War II. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gatemansgc (talk) 08:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


December 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of Vietnamese history. – Gilliam (talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked for 36 hours

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 10:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Count Count (talk) 10:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Biscuit. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Big Al has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Big Al was changed by 145.131.209.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960072 on 2018-11-05T09:29:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Al. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 00:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lil' Red, you may be blocked from editing. Leschnei (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Big Al. Shellwood (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Giulia Gwinn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Rutilant 10:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Len Stockwell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bergamasco Shepherd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to British School of Amsterdam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to British School of Amsterdam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply