January 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Del Rio, Texas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Laughlin Air Force Base, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm ChipWolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to For Life (TV series) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Chip๐Ÿบ 19:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributionsโ€”specifically this edit to Mario Party 2โ€”because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Supreme Court Police, but you didn't provide a source. Iโ€™ve removed it for now, but if youโ€™d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kevin Manno. Thank you. Yamaguchiๅ…ˆ็”Ÿ (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 416th Civil Affairs Battalion (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
echidnaLives - talk - edits 22:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 149.101.180.122! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! echidnaLives - talk - edits 22:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Okinawa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Okinawa, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 18:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Citing Wikipedia

edit

Hello 149.101.180.122, thank you for your edits. Please avoid citing Wikipedia as a source, see WP:CIRC. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 416th Civil Affairs Battalion (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was: ย The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Federal Correctional Institution, Safford, but you didn't provide a source. Iโ€™ve removed it for now, but if youโ€™d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solomon G. Brown. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. โ€”Teles ยซTalk to meหฑM @ C Sหฒยป 00:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm TheLightDeveloper. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jorge Solano Moreta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheLightDeveloper (talk) 18:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.๐‘ญ๐’Š๐’๐’Ž๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’”๐’” (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Isle of Man, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grachester (talk) 00:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Concern regarding Draft:416th Civil Affairs Battalion

edit

  Hello, 149.101.180.122. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:416th Civil Affairs Battalion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:416th Civil Affairs Battalion

edit
 

Hello, 149.101.180.122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "416th Civil Affairs Battalion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit to James E. Graves Jr. (August 2023)

edit

Hello,

You made an edit to James E. Graves Jr. stating there is a request by the person concerned to remove certain personal information. I assume this edit was made in good faith, however removal of well-sourced information on persons of public interest that does not violate their privacy should not be done in this manner.

I would strongly recommend raising this type of issue with the WP:VRT. Please be aware of WP:FAQ/AS. If there is no further comment on talk page for James E. Graves Jr. by WP:VRT, administrators or relevant persons in two days, I will revert the edit you made to blank the section Personal information.

Best regards, Shazback (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply