160.79.33.71

February 2024

Hello, I'm Voorts. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jack Posobiec without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry. Please forgive me. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hi 160.79.33.71! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 04:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Astrology. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Astrology is not a pseudoscience.

160.79.33.71 (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Astrology, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I’m sorry. I just now saw this. Please don’t block me. I will self revert. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Why was I blocked? 160.79.33.71 (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

160.79.33.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I deeply apologize for disruptive editing on here. I provided evidence that astrology wasn’t a pseudoscience but it was ignored. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Best you remain blocked. Yamla (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not an admin but typically a successful unblock request requires acknowledging what you did wrong and why unblocking you would be beneficial to Wikipedia. Insisting you were correct is not a path to getting unblocked. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Can you please explain it to me that astrology is pseudoscience? 160.79.33.71 (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Pseudoscience is still science. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

If you continue to comment like this an administrator will revoke your talk page access and possibly increase the length of time you remain blocked. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

F*ck you then. 👌🏻 #WPWW. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

160.79.33.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I deeply apologize for vandalizing Wikipedia and for my disruptive editing. If unblocked early, I would like to create an account and focus on contributing in the realm of literature. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. You're obviously not a good fit for this website. I've extended the block to encourage you to find a different outlet for your aggression, political POV-pushing, and advocacy of pseudoscience. And after looking up what "WPWW" means, I've disabled your ability to further edit this page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

WP:ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

---