Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.


January 2010

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library or institution's IP address might be disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Thank you.

Comments: Whilst sparse, the edits from this account have consistently been disruptive - continued similar edits will likely result in extended suspension of editing privileges.

May 2010

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of transgender people, you may be blocked from editing. Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
 

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of transgender people, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of transgender people was changed by 165.24.247.210 (u) (t) deleting 40212 characters on 2010-05-27T17:00:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 17:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Park ranger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

January 2011

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Apple sauce, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Godzilla. TheMikeWassup doc? 18:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Password, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leif Erikson Day with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 18:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Monte Vista High School (Spring Valley, California), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JOJ Hutton 19:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at File:Netscape 2.02.png. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 22:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asset. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm James086. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Community that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086Talk 18:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Code talker, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Code talker with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Avoided (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Jackson Peebles. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Oprah Winfrey's endorsement of Barack Obama because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jackson Peebles (talk) 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newton's laws of motion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — HHHIPPO 20:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States involvement in the Libyan civil war, you may be blocked from editing. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Michael Iaconelli, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. A.amitkumar (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Peru, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta 21:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Injuries caused by frying pans

edit

Hey 165.24, just thought I'd let you know I'm having a chat about the potential violent uses of Frying pans over at Talk:Frying pan, and as you've made remarks about their violent use in slapstick (which, incidentally, is another aspect the article could do with going into), I thought you'd be keen to join the discussion. Hope all is well! Horatio Snickers (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm 7Sidz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Bracero program, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 7Sidz (talk) 19:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cercocarpus ledifolius— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:01, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Japón. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Tol. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Amadeo Bordiga—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 16:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Andrew Marvin

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Andrew Marvin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Marvin (May 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 165.24.247.210! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 100 Years (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 17:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply