 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
December 2019
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
173.67.41.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Telling the truth is not vandalism. Funny how Wikipedia has an instant-undo for changes that don't conform to the status quo. There's even a Wiki page about status quo stonewalling :) 173.67.41.100 (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This has nothing to do with changes that don't conform to "the status quo"; this has to do with the clear vandalism that you engaged in. If you think that talking about "liberal vermin" is valid content, there is no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you, and I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
173.67.41.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is not the first time a change I have made (legitimate change) has been reverted near-instantly and my IP blocked for actually correcting an error on a page. It seems that Wikipedia has no interest in points of view outside its own view in whichever context is currently appropriate. I cite the edit to this talk page that says I won't do this again as the reason to be unblocked. But if it's rejected that's ok. Have a good day. :) Sorry if I offended you 331dot. 173.67.41.100 (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you think your edits were legitimate then you have no place on Wikipedia. Block extended, talk page access revoked to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yamla (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ut just FYI .. I won't do it again. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity :)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |