September 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Ronda Rousey, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wolverine, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wolverine, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wolverine

edit

Please take your edits to the Talk page. If you think a particular source is unreliable, you should make a better case for that than just saying so. Please don't edit war and continue to make the same edit over and over again. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit war warning

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Wolverine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnInDC (talk) 20:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

There's a discussion at Talk:Wolverine on this issue, which you're welcome to join. If you make this edit again - and particularly if you make it without engaging in the discussion to sway others to your point of view - you'll wind up blocked from editing. So please come talk. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rick Rude

edit

Reading is hard I guess. "Rood" was his real name, and such should be used sections dealing with his real life.★Trekker (talk) 07:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dominick Reyes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 21:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dominick Reyes, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia(talk) 22:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dominick Reyes. Cassiopeia(talk) 22:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm PlanetJuice. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dricus du Plessis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PlanetJuice (talkcontribs) 03:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply