August 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sarah Harding, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Space-Age Meat  21:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Ekips39. I noticed that you recently removed content from Benson Taylor without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ekips39 (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Uri Davis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dave Navarro. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Dave Navarro. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Brettandelle. Binksternet (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Brettandelle per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply