192.76.8.65

March 2019

Hello, I'm Robynthehode. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Behe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mathew Hudson, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Velletri. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 21:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Pusey House, Oxford. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 12:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please read the policies on edit-warring and particular 3RR before reporting someone. Tvx1 03:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

@Tvx1 Perhaps you should read the policies on edit warring since you seem unfamiliar with them. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so. is in the second paragraph of the policy. Trying to win a content dispute by making the same edit five times is edit warring. 192.76.8.65 (talk) 10:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

---