October 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bradley Wright-Phillips— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Peter Crouch. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded with them hundreds 10:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bobby Shmurda, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 10:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leroy Sané.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Leroy Sané was changed by 194.83.51.26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860763 on 2018-10-19T10:40:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Birmingham Metropolitan College. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Harry- (talk) 13:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Birmingham Metropolitan College— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply