195.162.12.14

May 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Adam Curtis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nick Cooper (talk) 14:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article M1NT, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Jardine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chloe Smith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• keeps public sector jet set's £77m flight bill a mystery |publisher=Telegraph |date=03 August 2013]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rotherhithe has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rotherhithe was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://russiadock.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/the-mayflower-and-pilgrim-fathers.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to October 2— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Molloy Window

Hello, 195.162.12.14. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Molloy Window".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 21:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Infobox stats

Hi there - we only include league stats in the infobox, thanks! GiantSnowman 10:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to SS Normandie— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hugo Lowell, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —Aranya (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Restore Trust seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

The actual entry as written before is inaccurate. Restore Trust had nothing to do with motions to the 2022 AGM on Rewilding and Pride. This was wrongly reported in Telegraph and Guardian but both subsequently printed corrections. See correction at bottom of this Guardian report: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/oct/31/national-trust-set-for-fresh-battle-over-culture-wars

Also see correction at end on this Telegraph report: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/environment/2022/09/07/national-trust-fears-many-volunteers-wont-come-back-numbers/

Also the use of "seeks top take over control" is not neutral. Restore Trust put up candidates for election - even if all seven had won, they would only have been a minority. The Council has 37 m,embers - and does not have Executive power in any case 195.162.12.14 (talk) 16:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---