October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. An edit that you recently made to Snowmaking seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 01:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Military history of New Zealand. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Moriori (talk) 03:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Trlovejoy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to State of Origin series, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TRL (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm HangingCurve. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Annastacia Palaszczuk, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 03:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to South Korea ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hyperloop, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General11:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Elon Musk. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract02:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Elon Musk.   —Aladdin Sane (talk) 04:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Elon Musk, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.   —Aladdin Sane (talk) 04:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

That link was on the Elon Musk page for a very long time. Many months in fact. Only a vandal would remove an established link without warning. Vandalism reverted AGAIN! 202.86.32.122 (talk) 04:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Elon Musk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please understand that an irrelevant link is irrelevant regardless of how long it's been there. Fansites are in the list of WP:LINKSTOAVOID and should not be in the article. Please do not revert again. agtx 04:55, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Agtx: @Ebyabe: User:Aladdin Sane is taking a 12 hour wikibreak. He may have an opinion beyond this period.   —Aladdin Sane (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Note to the IP. Don't add links to Facebook fan pages. It didn't work for Hyperloop, it didn't work for Annastacia Palaszczuk, it definitely didn't work for Doctor Who or Peter Capaldi, it won't work for Elon Musk. Thank you and have a nice day. --Ebyabe talk - State of the Union14:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elon Musk. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Glen 02:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

His official page is Twitter so try to explain why Twitter is ok but his Facebook group isn't. Maybe you should leave Wikipedia and come back when you have done some research. 202.86.32.122 (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to make this really clear

edit

The link is a clear breach of wikipedia policy. If you add it again you WILL be blocked. Glen 02:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If his twitter link is allowed then the facebook page is too mr VANDAL. Go away and educate yourself before doing any more damage TROLL. 202.86.32.122 (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:202.86.32.122 reported by User:Agtx (Result: ). Thank you. agtx 02:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The official website for Elon Musk is on TWITTER. If TWITTER is allowed on Elon's page then so is FACEBOOK. Am I going too fast for you? 202.86.32.122 (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Glen 02:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Glen is a troll and vandal. 202.86.32.122 (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pot, meet kettle. --Ebyabe talk - Inspector General04:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

A topic in which you are involved

edit

The discussion can be found here. --Ebyabe talk - General Health04:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Elon Musk has been reverted.
Your edit here to Elon Musk was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/groups/elonmusk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Elon Musk

edit

Unless you can prove that the Facebook group is somehow official, it's gonna keep getting removed. I don't see it listed on Musk's Twitter page, so how official can it be? Again, prove it's official, and maybe it will stay. Otherwise, it ain't staying and if you keep adding it, you will likely get blocked. Again. Cheers! --Ebyabe talk - General Health00:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 00:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Elon Musk, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 00:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elon Musk, you may be blocked from editing. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel00:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 00:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Flash (comics) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copy and pasting

edit

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

http://act.australian-democrats.org.au/objectives.php#.V0g3LNQrJ1N

May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Philo Farnsworth have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to List of taekwondo grandmasters have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to List of taekwondo grandmasters was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXnzz10mlKs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Henri Rousseau— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mark Donaldson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Optimist on the run (talk) 05:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. – Gilliam (talk) 05:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Armin Navabi have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Armin Navabi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/secularists) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to American Humanist Association. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to American Humanist Association was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.atheistforum.org (redirects to www.facebook.com/groups/secularists)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Secular movement, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  
Your edit here to Secular movement was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.atheistforum.org (redirects to www.facebook.com/groups/secularists)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bracken Ridge, Queensland—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 04:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Section 25 of the Constitution of Australia

edit

I appreciate you're putting a lot of thought into this article, but the content needs to be limited to section 25 only, not general content about constitutional recognition or what other countries have done - unless a reliable source has made that comparison. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 01:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Section 25 of the Constitution of Australia. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Manticore 00:47, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Section 25 of the Constitution of Australia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kb.au (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring on Section 25 of the Constitution of Australia

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Section 25 of the Constitution of Australia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Manticore 00:47, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Mako001. An edit you recently made to King and pawn versus king endgame seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Funnyfarmofdoom. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Powered hang glider. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also familiarize yourself with MOS:LEAD, as the information added was overly technical for the introduction section. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 01:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I don't know your crappy coding format. The link is a source for my claim. Thanks for deleting the proof for the corrections I made to that error filled page (Personal attack removed).

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Powered hang glider. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 01:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I AM CORRECTING AN ARTICLE WHICH FALSELY CLAIMS ALL POWERED HANG GLIDERS HAVE A HANG MOTOR! I EVEN GAVE YOU A LINK TO A VIDEO DISPLAYING A KING POST MOUNTED MOTOR! YOU PEOPLE ARE (Personal attack removed)! 202.86.32.122 (talk) 01:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Powered hang glider. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Q T C 01:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Powered hang glider. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 01:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Powered hang glider, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 02:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)== Powered hang glider ==Reply

We're well past the Bold and Revert steps in WP:BRD and well into Edit Warring, please take discussion to the talk page to reach Consensus before making any more changes to Powered hang glider.Q T C 02:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

To the IP:
I must add that the main issue is the youtube link is promotional, rather than inaccurate. Try to find a non-promotional source.
And stop making personal attacks. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Have done so. Since you (Personal attack removed) are so fond of errors and prefer false claims to facts I'm giving up on trying to correct the page. All I have gotten is insults for my efforts and zero assistance. Me making personal attacks? I wanted to spend 5 minutes here correcting your mistakes. Instead I have wasted ages and been called a VANDAL and SPAMMER by you (Personal attack removed)! The video is not spam. Its from a hang gliding club in Western Australia. The motors are made by ex-WA champion Rob Berndes. He doesn't sell them. Instructions on how to build them are given on another video. You are all (Personal attack removed)! 202.86.32.122 (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Q T C 02:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@OverlordQ Thanks! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hang gliding, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Imane Khelif. Please note that we have absolutely no proof that any of the claims you have made are true. --DanielRigal (talk) 02:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looking at the other warnings on this page, I am surprised that Brisbane City Council has allowed its resources to be abused so much for so long. I suspect that they might not be aware of it. I also suspect that if somebody were to draw their attention to it that they might be quite angry. --DanielRigal (talk) 02:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Jiffles1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Residential colleges of the University of Queensland—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jiffles1 (talk) 01:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Residential colleges of the University of Queensland. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

November 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 04:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.