2020Thomas

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020Thomas (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:2020Thomas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:2020Thomas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 2020Thomas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:2020Thomas

A tag has been placed on User:2020Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS ^💬 15:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2020Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I posted an unblock request here a few days ago, but it has disappeared. Please unblock me because I did nothing wrong. When I submitted an article for review, I declared that it had been paid for, following Wikipedia rules. I am not a sock puppet of Hedgehog59804. I do know Hedgehog59804 but I am a different user. That user did the wrong thing and got banned. I did the right thing and I shouldn't be blamed for another user's mistake.2020Thomas (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edit history and the history of this page does not show any other unblock requests added. Please read WP:MEAT. We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer making edits or operating any particular account, so when two accounts appear to be doing the same thing, we must treat them as if they are both operated by the same person. You will need to go into more detail about your circumstances and tell what it is you want to edit about if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2020Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know what happened to that first request. I'm glad somebody saw my second request. Please note that I did NOT do the same thing as Hedgehog59804, because I declared that the article I submitted was paid work for a client – he didn't declare that! My relationship with Hedgehog59804 is that we are freelancers who sometimes work together. He foolishly tried to submit an article without declaring that it had been paid for. I understand that he is now banned forever from Wikipedia, so I took over the project from him and advised him to stay away from Wikipedia in the future. I tried to do things the right way. I disclosed that the article was paid for when I submitted it. I was very clear that it was paid for, so I didn't imagine that I would be breaking any rules. Anyway, my article was rejected by an editor because of unsuitable content, so I am not going to waste time resubmitting it. That article is dead. At the moment I don't have any plans to submit any new Wikipedia articles. But I am interested in editing existing Wikipedia articles. I've seen the big list of articles that need improvement because they're badly written etc. and that's what I'd like to do if I can get unblocked.

Decline reason:

Sorry, this is the end of the line. We aren't interested in unblocking a WP:MEAT to continue WP:PAID WP:PROMO editing. Yamla (talk) 10:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2020Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To Yamla: I am not going to continue paid editing. I have no intention of submitting any kind of promotional article to Wikipedia ever again. 2020Thomas (talk) 20:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Thank you for offering to help Wikipedia. However, we already have enough spammers and don't need more. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.