To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. An automated review of your submission has been completed, and revealed serious problems which will likely cause your submission to be declined. Your submission appears to contain no sources. Third party sources are required so the information can be verified and to establish the notability of the topic. Your submission has not been declined yet, but this warning is to inform you that it will be declined within an hour if no changes are made to it. Don't worry, if your submission is declined you are always welcome to resubmit it after addressing its problems. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snotbot (talk) 14:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. An automated review of your submission has been completed, and revealed serious problems which will likely cause your submission to be declined. Your submission appears to contain no sources. Third party sources are required so the information can be verified and to establish the notability of the topic. Your submission has not been declined yet, but this warning is to inform you that it will be declined within an hour if no changes are made to it. Don't worry, if your submission is declined you are always welcome to resubmit it after addressing its problems. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snotbot (talk) 14:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ryan C. Lokker. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!


Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gernard J. Pickleburg. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --Chris (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ryan C. Lokker

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ryan C. Lokker, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Monty845 14:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Financial District (Metromover station) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Chris (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Financial District (Metromover station), you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Financial District (Metromover station), you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Financial District (Metromover station) was changed by 206.193.195.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961558 on 2011-09-29T15:02:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ryan Lokker. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Frideric Handel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

March 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nathan Bedford Forrest, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Vertium. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Howard Shore because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vertium When all is said and done 17:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Galapagos Hawk, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 15:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Galapagos Hawk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Galapagos Hawk with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Galapagos Hawk. DVdm (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ghosts (Pac-Man) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of countries by life expectancy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annunciation Orthodox School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of countries by life expectancy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Turgan Talk 18:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Diannaa (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to Robert L. Clarke

edit

  Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Robert L. Clarke), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - Cwobeel (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Robert L. Clarke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Open proxy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Open proxy was changed by 206.193.195.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93888 on 2016-01-27T22:02:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ordovician has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ordovician was changed by 206.193.195.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962884 on 2016-03-31T15:33:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wilhelmina FitzClarence, Countess of Munster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wilhelmina FitzClarence, Countess of Munster, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Benjamin Franklin, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Zimmermann Telegram— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zimmermann Telegram. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jebcubed (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.