October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to CPU cache—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 10:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Fehufanga, thanks for the info.
I have added two more sources and resubmitted it. I think the topic deserves some attention and it is already discussed in investopedia in greater detail https://www.investopedia.com/zero-days-to-expiration-0dte-options-and-how-do-they-work-6753832.
Cheers from Germany, Frank 217.24.14.54 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 0DTE (February 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 10:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 217.24.14.54! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JavaHurricane 10:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 217.24.14.54 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
217.24.14.54 (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have just added a bit more context and sources. I think the 0DTE options are an interesting topic because mainstream is writing about them. Also from a scientific aspect they are interesting as they are in fact options on discrete jump processes. Best, Frank

Your submission at Articles for creation: 0DTE (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:0DTE

edit

  Hello, 217.24.14.54. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:0DTE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi 174.67.208.167! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, new article on 0DTE refused, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.