October 2023
edit
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2023 NRL Grand Final, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Happily888 (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- What vandalism? The timestamps matched the game clock. Clutching at straws. 220.236.126.177 (talk) 07:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please see WP:OR and WP:CITE regarding original research/synthesis and citing reliable sources. See Help:PG for further information. Happily888 (talk) 07:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:220.236.126.177 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: ). Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 07:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- You can rescind your report 220.236.126.177 (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
220.236.126.177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Admin ~ ToBeFree already determined the block was to be lifted, you can't just overrule it. Lift this new one immediately. 220.236.126.177 (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were unblocked with the understanding you'd cease edit warring. You specifically said, "Going forward if something I submit as an edit is deemed not useful there is obviously nothing I can do about it and will have to move on." Rather than doing that, you went right back to violating WP:EW. The block from Bbb23 is for your behaviour after your previous unblock. Bbb23 is not reverting your unblock, he is placing a new block upon you. This is entirely appropriate. Yamla (talk) 13:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
220.236.126.177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Correction, entirely inappropriate. Reopening an already resolved dispute doesn't seem very fair. A long series of blocks have already been served, I'm not about to sit through another one. So again, you can lift this new one as it is in place under false pretenses. 220.236.126.177 (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, you can sit through another one. You violated WP:EW and this is a new block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It appears that the allegations of block evasion at AN3 are correct. Back in 2022, another of your IPs, User talk:220.236.117.40, was blocked twice for block evasion of User:CodyCruickshank. Just like your other IP where you were equally combative (an understatement, actually), I am revoking TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
220.236.126.177 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If somebody were to take a look at contributions made since the most recent unblock rejection, contrary to what was previously stated, I have in fact been following disengagement and resolutions per article talk pages. For this reason I do not see why the 1 year ban should remain in place having followed what was agreed upon when I was already unblocked. 220.236.112.225 (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You didn't disengage, if you had, you wouldn't have been blocked. This block is entirely appropriate. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have extended the block due to the recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
And I have further extended it due to more recent evasion using 49.3.90.116 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |