24.126.12.87

October 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 21:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

"Block evasion"

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.126.12.87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Izno why do you think I'm evading a block? Is it because I mentioned @Deleet's name (Generalrelative thinks this is super secret nazi insider knowledge) in my first wikipedia edit? I decided to comment on wikipedia after I looked at some R&I archives and read an SPLC article that mentioned him. This was the only "reason" Biohistorian15 thinks I'm ban-evading. Maybe Generalrelative knows some extra background that xe just won't tell me. It's hilarious though that WP:AUTIST editors really claim anyone who wrongthinks on R&I or trolls you clowns must be a sockpuppet of an editor that got banned 10 years ago. Although, I think Biohistorian15 is just virtue signalling [1] that he's not racist (despite probably still thinking certain races have lower intelligence for genetic reasons). I'll stop posting so you all aren't distracted from making 10,000 pointless edits every year (and pretending that makes you Einstein [2]).

24.126.11.219 (talk) 00:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe you shouldn't call other editors, such as me, racist in your unblock request. That's against WP:NPA. I find it hard to believe that you wouldn't know this policy insofar as you also knew WP:AUTIST... Biohistorian15 (talk) 07:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

---